NH-66 construction flaws to be probed in Kerala, report to go to Centre

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
NH-66 construction flaws to be probed in Kerala, report to go to Centre

Synopsis

Kerala's Public Works Minister has promised an investigation into alleged construction deficiencies in NH-66 — raised embankments and tunnel-like underpasses that have alarmed residents in densely populated coastal districts. The findings will go to Union Minister Nitin Gadkari, but with most work already complete, retrofitting the highway to address design concerns will be a costly, complex challenge.

Key Takeaways

Kerala Public Works Minister P.K.
Basheer announced on 16 October 2026 that the state will investigate alleged flaws in NH-66 construction.
Findings will be forwarded to Union Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari at the Centre.
Sudhakaran demanded conversion of the 16-km Kalarkode–Thottappally spillway stretch in Alappuzha district into a continuous elevated highway.
Minister Basheer said conversion at this stage would require major redesign, reconstruction, and additional expenditure, making it difficult.
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) holds sole authority over NH-66 planning, design, and construction in Kerala.
No immediate assurance was given that existing raised embankments or underpasses would be redesigned.

Kerala's Public Works Minister P.K. Basheer told the state Assembly on Friday, 16 October 2026, that the government will investigate alleged construction deficiencies in National Highway 66 (NH-66) and forward the findings to Union Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari at the Centre. The assurance follows growing concern over the highway's design — particularly its raised embankments and underpasses — in densely populated stretches of Kerala.

What Triggered the Assembly Discussion

The issue was raised by G. Sudhakaran MLA, who demanded that the 16-km stretch from Kalarkode to the northern side of the Thottappally spillway in Alappuzha district be converted into a continuous elevated highway. He also sought a review of existing construction shortcomings, arguing that the highway's design had not adequately accounted for Kerala's high population density and the large number of towns along the route.

Sudhakaran said raised road sections resembling walls and underpasses resembling tunnels at certain locations had caused alarm among local residents. His submission reflects a broader anxiety in the state about whether NH-66 — a critical north-south artery — was designed with Kerala's unique urban geography in mind.

What the Minister Said

Minister Basheer acknowledged the concerns but was measured in his response. He explained that converting the near-completed stretch into a continuous elevated highway at this stage would be difficult, as it would require major alterations to the approved design, extensive reconstruction, and significant additional expenditure.

He also clarified the jurisdictional reality: the ownership, control, and development of national highways rest with the Central government, and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) is solely responsible for the planning, design, construction, and maintenance of NH-66 in Kerala. The minister noted that the choice between elevated highways, flyovers, underpasses, embankments, and retaining structures is governed by engineering requirements, traffic conditions, and technical and financial feasibility — and that elevated structures carry higher costs due to the need for piles, pillars, and superstructures.

Basheer did not offer any immediate assurance that existing structures would be redesigned. Instead, the proposed probe and its subsequent submission to the Centre will determine next steps.

The Broader Design Debate

The concerns over NH-66 are not entirely new. Critics have long argued that highway design in Kerala must account for the state's ribbon-development pattern, where towns and habitations run almost continuously along major roads. Raised embankments that serve as walls can sever communities, impede drainage, and restrict access to local businesses — issues that are particularly acute in coastal districts such as Alappuzha.

Notably, this surfaces a recurring tension in national highway projects across India: the NHAI applies standardised engineering templates that may not always align with state-specific conditions, while state governments retain limited authority to intervene in design or execution.

What Happens Next

The Kerala government's investigation will feed into a formal report to be submitted to Union Minister Gadkari. Whether that report leads to any design modifications, retrofits, or compensation for affected residents remains to be seen. The episode also tests how effectively state governments can influence Central infrastructure projects already in advanced stages of completion.

Point of View

In any case, largely outside state authority. The real structural problem here is jurisdictional: NHAI designs highways to national templates, while states bear the social and political cost of community disruption. Until there is a formal mechanism requiring NHAI to incorporate state-specific urban-density data into design approvals, disputes like the NH-66 row will recur. With most of the highway already built, the window for meaningful correction is narrowing fast, and a report to Gadkari — however well-intentioned — may arrive too late to matter on the ground.
NationPress
16 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the alleged flaws in NH-66's construction in Kerala?
The concerns centre on raised embankments that act as barriers in densely populated areas and underpasses that residents have described as tunnel-like. Critics argue the design did not adequately account for Kerala's high population density and the large number of towns along the highway's route.
Why is the Kerala government sending a report to the Centre rather than fixing the issues itself?
National Highway 66 falls under the jurisdiction of the Central government, and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) is solely responsible for its planning, design, construction, and maintenance. The Kerala government can raise concerns but cannot unilaterally alter the highway's design or construction.
What did MLA G. Sudhakaran demand in the Assembly?
Sudhakaran demanded that the 16-km stretch from Kalarkode to the northern side of the Thottappally spillway in Alappuzha district be converted into a continuous elevated highway. He also sought a review of existing construction shortcomings across the route.
Is converting the disputed NH-66 stretch into an elevated highway feasible?
Minister P.K. Basheer indicated it would be difficult, as most construction work on the stretch is already complete. Any conversion would require major design alterations, extensive reconstruction, and significant additional expenditure, all of which depend on Central government approval.
What happens after the investigation report is submitted to the Centre?
Once the Kerala government completes its investigation, the findings will be sent to Union Minister Nitin Gadkari. The Centre's response — whether to order design modifications, commission retrofits, or take no immediate action — will determine the next steps for addressing the alleged deficiencies.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 1 year ago
  3. 1 year ago
  4. 1 year ago
  5. 1 year ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google