Why is Kiren Rijiju Criticizing the Opposition's 'Escape Strategy' on Operation Sindoor?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
On July 28, Union Minister Kiren Rijiju sharply criticized the Opposition for their last-minute tactics to avoid discussing Operation Sindoor, emphasizing the need for unity and respect towards the Indian armed forces. This call to action highlights the tension within Parliament and the urgent need for clarity on national security matters.
Key Takeaways
- Kiren Rijiju criticized the Opposition for obstructing parliamentary proceedings.
- The debate on Operation Sindoor is of national significance.
- Rijiju warned against using language that could demoralize the armed forces.
- The Business Advisory Committee (BAC) sets the framework for parliamentary discussions.
- Opposition's last-minute conditions were deemed inappropriate by Rijiju.
New Delhi, July 28 (NationPress) - Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju launched a fierce critique against the Opposition on Monday for obstructing Parliament proceedings and reneging on their promise to engage in the debate regarding 'Operation Sindoor'. He cautioned them against using rhetoric that could undermine the morale of the Indian armed forces.
Rijiju urged the Opposition parties to avoid adopting the language of Pakistan during discussions focused on India's military actions against cross-border terrorism.
Addressing the media after both Houses of Parliament were adjourned for the second time that day, Rijiju stated, "Just moments ago, the Opposition took a U-turn from their commitment and staged a performance of walking away from the discussion on Operation Sindoor. Such behavior is unacceptable. Parliament is set to reconvene in half an hour, and these newly imposed conditions from the Opposition will not be entertained."
He confirmed that Defence Minister Rajnath Singh would present the government's proposal and initiate the debate on Operation Sindoor.
"The Opposition must listen to him. No party should resort to the language of Pakistan or utter anything that diminishes the spirit of our military," he firmly stated.
Rijiju disclosed that all parties had previously agreed to commence the 16-hour debate around 12:15 P.M., but right before it was about to start, the Opposition introduced a new condition: a guarantee from the government that the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) issue would be addressed after the discussion on Operation Sindoor.
"Parliament does not operate in this fashion. Discussions are agreed upon collaboratively in the Business Advisory Committee (BAC). Introducing such last-minute demands is inappropriate," Rijiju expressed, showing disappointment over what he described as an "escape strategy" from the Congress and other Opposition parties.
"Why are the Congress and other parties now evading a discussion they've been calling for over two months? The nation deserves answers. We have been ready to debate Operation Sindoor from day one," he added.
In a further admonishment of the Opposition, Rijiju declared, "This is not mere disruption; this is betraying the nation. You are seeking excuses to evade a discussion that the country is eagerly awaiting."
With the Parliament convening amidst heightened anticipation for the scheduled discourse on Operation Sindoor, Speaker Om Birla entered the chamber at 12:06 P.M. to address the escalating disorder regarding the proposed discussion. He reminded members that the Business Advisory Committee had unanimously agreed to schedule the debate, and that Opposition leaders had verbally consented during a meeting in his chamber.
Expressing his discontent, Birla remarked that some members were now backtracking on that agreement.
Meanwhile, Opposition MPs continued to chant slogans demanding an immediate discussion not only on 'Operation Sindoor' but also on the SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar.
The phrase "SIR par charcha karo" resonated throughout the chamber as Speaker Birla repeatedly urged members to adhere to parliamentary protocols.
He pointedly questioned whether the House wished to proceed with the debate, stressing that discussions must follow the framework established by the Business Advisory Committee and not through shouting slogans in the Bell of the House.
Unable to restore order, Birla adjourned the House until 1 P.M.
Point of View
It's crucial for us to remain neutral. The ongoing debate surrounding Operation Sindoor highlights the significant divide in Parliament. While the government pushes for transparency and accountability in matters of national security, the Opposition's strategy raises questions about their commitment to discussing vital issues. Our focus should remain on fostering a constructive dialogue that serves the interests of the nation.
NationPress
22/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Operation Sindoor?
Operation Sindoor is a military initiative aimed at addressing cross-border terrorism and safeguarding national security.
Why did the Opposition walk away from the debate?
The Opposition introduced new conditions just before the debate was scheduled to begin, which led to their withdrawal.
What did Kiren Rijiju say about the Opposition's actions?
Rijiju criticized the Opposition for stalling proceedings and warned against using language that could demoralize the armed forces.
Who will lead the discussion on Operation Sindoor?
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh is set to present the government's proposal and lead the discussion.
What is the significance of this debate?
The debate is crucial for understanding India's military responses and addressing national security concerns.
