'Assault on Democracy': KTR Critiques Speaker's Ruling on Defectors

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
'Assault on Democracy': KTR Critiques Speaker's Ruling on Defectors

Synopsis

K. T. Rama Rao, BRS working president, has vocally criticized the Telangana Assembly Speaker's exoneration of MLAs Danam Nagender and Kadiyam Srihari, labeling it an outright attack on democratic principles. His remarks highlight the growing concern over political defections in the state.

Key Takeaways

Rama Rao has called the Speaker's decision an assault on democracy.
The MLAs involved switched from BRS to Congress .
The ruling may lead to increased political defections.
The Speaker dismissed all petitions against ten defecting MLAs.
Concerns about the integrity of democratic processes are growing.

Hyderabad, March 11 (NationPress) K. T. Rama Rao, the working president of Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS), has described the Telangana Assembly Speaker's decision to clear MLAs Danam Nagender and Kadiyam Srihari of any wrongdoing in the anti-defection case as a blatant assault on democracy.

In a strong response posted on 'X', he criticized Speaker Gaddam Prasad Kumar for rejecting the disqualification petitions against Nagender and Srihari, both of whom were elected on BRS tickets in 2023 but later switched allegiance to the ruling Congress party.

Rama Rao condemned the Speaker for exonerating Nagender, who is running for a Lok Sabha seat under the Congress symbol in 2024, deeming it a profound disrespect to the electorate's choice.

The BRS leader indicated that such actions from the Speaker would foster further defections, calling it a somber day in the history of democracy.

"This is not merely a ruling; it exemplifies the manipulation of the Constitutional framework to benefit those in power. When elected officials, secured by the people's votes, abandon their posts for personal gain, and the Speaker endorses this, it raises serious questions about our democratic principles," he remarked.

He further stated, "Such rulings undermine public confidence. The citizens of Telangana are observant and will respond appropriately in due course," KTR emphasized.

Previously, the Speaker declared that the petitions for disqualifying Kadiyam Srihari and Danam Nagender were dismissed because the petitioners failed to provide adequate evidence demonstrating that the two MLAs defected to the Congress party.

Last week, the Speaker concluded hearings on petitions filed by BRS MLA Kaushik Reddy and BJP MLA Maheshwar Reddy concerning Nagender, as well as BRS MLA K. P. Vivekanand's petition against Srihari.

The Speaker has now dismissed disqualification petitions for all ten BRS MLAs who shifted their allegiance to Congress in 2024, shortly after the Congress party took power in the state.

In December 2025, he also dismissed petitions against five MLAs: Tellam Venkat Rao, Bandla Krishna Mohan Reddy, T. Prakash Goud, Gudem Mahipal Reddy, and Arekapudi Gandhi.

On January 15, he rejected the petitions for Pocharam Srinivas Reddy and Kale Yadaiah, and on February 4, the petition against BRS MLA Sanjay Kumar was also dismissed.

In all instances, the Speaker ruled that the petitioners did not provide sufficient evidence of defection to Congress, thus determining that the Anti-Defection Act could not be applied.

Point of View

The situation surrounding K. T. Rama Rao's condemnation of the Telangana Assembly Speaker's ruling reflects a broader concern regarding political integrity and the sanctity of democratic processes. The fight against defections remains a critical issue that resonates with citizens across the nation.
NationPress
5 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did K. T. Rama Rao say about the Speaker's ruling?
K. T. Rama Rao condemned the Speaker's clean chit to MLAs Danam Nagender and Kadiyam Srihari, calling it an open attack on democracy.
Who are the MLAs involved in this controversy?
The MLAs involved are Danam Nagender and Kadiyam Srihari, both of whom initially contested on BRS tickets before defecting to the Congress party.
What is the significance of the Speaker's ruling?
The ruling is seen as a potential encouragement for political defections, raising concerns about the erosion of democratic values.
What impact could this have on the BRS party?
This situation could undermine public trust in the BRS party and affect its electoral prospects in future elections.
How has the Speaker justified his decision?
The Speaker stated that there was insufficient evidence to disqualify the MLAs, thus ruling that the Anti-Defection Act did not apply.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 months ago
  2. 3 months ago
  3. 3 months ago
  4. 3 months ago
  5. 4 months ago
  6. 5 months ago
  7. 5 months ago
  8. 7 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google