Why Did the Telangana Speaker Dismiss the Disqualification Petitions Against Five BRS MLAs?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant political development, Telangana Assembly Speaker Gaddam Prasad Kumar has dismissed petitions to disqualify five BRS MLAs accused of defecting to Congress. This pivotal ruling underscores the complexities of party loyalty and anti-defection laws in Indian politics.
Key Takeaways
- The Telangana Assembly Speaker dismissed petitions against five BRS MLAs.
- The ruling emphasized the non-applicability of the anti-defection law in this case.
- Ongoing hearings will determine the fate of three additional MLAs.
- The Supreme Court has intervened in the disqualification process.
- This decision may reshape the political landscape in Telangana.
Hyderabad, Dec 17 (NationPress) - The Speaker of the Telangana Assembly, Gaddam Prasad Kumar, announced on Wednesday the dismissal of petitions aimed at disqualifying five BRS MLAs accused of shifting allegiance to the ruling Congress.
In delivering the verdict on these disqualification petitions, the Speaker noted that the petitioners did not present sufficient proof that the MLAs had defected to Congress.
The Speaker clarified that the anti-defection law does not pertain to MLAs Tellam Venkat Rao, Bandla Krishna Mohan Reddy, T. Prakash Goud, Gudem Mahipal Reddy, and Arekapudi Gandhi.
He emphasized that these MLAs remain formally part of the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS).
The Speaker's ruling followed petitions for the disqualification of five out of ten BRS MLAs accused of switching their loyalty to the ruling party.
He has completed hearings on the disqualification petitions for eight MLAs and has reserved his orders.
On Thursday, the Speaker is expected to announce decisions regarding the disqualification of three other MLAs - Kale Yadaiah, Sanjay Kumar, and Pocharam Srinivas Reddy.
Decisions regarding two additional MLAs, Danam Nagender and Kadiyam Srihari, will likely follow after they provide responses to the notices issued to them.
These MLAs have requested additional time to reply to the notice sent by the Speaker last month.
The BRS filed petitions seeking the disqualification of ten MLAs who were elected under its banner in the 2023 elections but shifted allegiance to Congress in 2024.
While the BRS accused these MLAs of openly aligning with Congress and occupying treasury benches in the Assembly, the MLAs countered that they only met with Chief Minister Revanth Reddy to request funds for their constituencies' development.
The BRS pointed out to the Speaker that Nagender not only joined the Congress but also contested the 2024 Lok Sabha election from Secunderabad on a Congress ticket.
Additionally, it alleged that Kadiyam Srihari actively campaigned for his daughter Kadiyam Kaviya, who ran for the Lok Sabha from the Warangal constituency as a Congress candidate.
On November 17, the Supreme Court served a contempt notice to the Telangana Speaker for failing to comply with its directive regarding disqualification pleas against the ten MLAs.
A bench led by the then Chief Justice B.R. Gavai had instructed the Assembly Speaker to resolve the disqualification matter within three months.
This bench labeled the disregard of its previous directives as the 'grossest kind of contempt' while issuing notices to the Speaker and others concerning petitions filed by BRS leaders.
Point of View
It raises important questions about party loyalty and the enforcement of anti-defection laws in India. While the Speaker's decision defends the current MLAs, it also signifies the complexities of political allegiance in a dynamic electoral environment. Therefore, it is crucial to observe how this situation unfolds in the coming days.
NationPress
17/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted the petitions for disqualification of the BRS MLAs?
The petitions were filed based on allegations that the five BRS MLAs had shifted their allegiance to the ruling Congress party.
What was the Speaker's ruling regarding the anti-defection law?
The Speaker ruled that the anti-defection law does not apply to the MLAs in question, allowing them to remain in BRS.
What are the next steps following the Speaker's decision?
The Speaker is expected to make further announcements regarding the disqualification of three other MLAs soon.
How did the Supreme Court get involved in this matter?
The Supreme Court issued a contempt notice to the Telangana Speaker for not complying with a directive to resolve the disqualification pleas.
What implications does this ruling have for the political landscape?
This ruling may influence party dynamics and the interpretation of loyalty within the context of Indian politics.
