Did the Madras HC Order an SIT Investigation into the Vijay Rally Stampede?

Click to start listening
Did the Madras HC Order an SIT Investigation into the Vijay Rally Stampede?

Synopsis

In a poignant turn of events, the Madras High Court established a special investigation team to delve into the recent stampede at Vijay’s rally. With 41 lives lost, the court's decision reflects a pressing need for accountability among event organizers amidst national outrage.

Key Takeaways

  • Madras High Court establishes a SIT for thorough investigation.
  • Only two arrests made so far in connection with the stampede.
  • Event organizers criticized for lack of responsibility.
  • Future political rallies must have enhanced safety protocols.
  • Importance of immediate action in emergency situations highlighted.

Chennai, Oct 3 (NationPress) The Madras High Court expressed deep sorrow over the tragic loss of lives and has established a special investigation team (SIT) led by IPS officer Asra Garg to investigate the stampede in Karur, which resulted in the deaths of 41 individuals on September 27.

Justice N Senthilkumar remarked, “It is painful to watch the videos,” highlighting his dismay that only two arrests have been made thus far related to the tragedy.

The court criticized the leaders of the Tamilaga Vetri Kazhagam (TVK) and those organizing the rally for actor-turned-politician Vijay, pointing out their failure to assist the public and children during the chaos, and for evading responsibility.

“Despite expressions of grief and rescue efforts from the President, Prime Minister, Chief Minister, and various political parties, the event organizers—party members—have completely distanced themselves,” the court stated.

In forming the SIT, Justice Senthilkumar instructed the Karur Police to promptly provide all documentation concerning the stampede to the investigation team.

In a related issue, the High Court has postponed its decision on the anticipatory bail request from TVK General Secretary Bussi Anand and Deputy General Secretary Nirmal Kumar, without setting a date for the ruling.

The court previously acknowledged an accident linked to Vijay's campaign, questioning, “Has a case been registered regarding this?”

With the emergence of videos depicting the alleged incident, the court remarked, “What is stopping the police from registering a case? Even in the absence of a complaint, the police are obliged to file one.”

A division bench consisting of M. Dhandapani and M. Jothiraman dismissed a petition from BJP leader Uma Anandan demanding a CBI inquiry into the stampede but allowed her to return to court if the investigation proceeds inadequately.

“This court should not be treated as a political battleground,” the court emphasized, questioning the petitioner's standing in the matter.

“We will intervene if individuals aggrieved by this court come forward,” stated the court, urging the petitioner to allow the investigation into the September 27 incident to advance from its initial phase.

The BJP leader had called for a High Court directive for a CBI inquiry, alleging that the fatalities stemmed from official negligence.

The High Court issued the order while reviewing multiple petitions, including some that requested an increase in compensation for the victims.

The bench acknowledged the Tamil Nadu government’s proposal to create standard operating procedures (SoPs) for rallies or gatherings, recommending that events be prohibited near state or national highways.

The court advised that future political rallies or gatherings should be organized at designated locations, ensuring adequate provisions for drinking water and sanitation.

Moreover, the bench stressed the need for escape routes and parking areas to reduce the risk of stampedes.

Point of View

Which resulted in significant loss of life, underscores the urgent need for accountability and improved safety measures in public gatherings. It is vital for political organizations to take responsibility in ensuring the safety of attendees, especially in high-pressure environments. The Madras High Court's intervention is a necessary step towards justice and reform.
NationPress
03/10/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Madras High Court's response to the stampede?
The Madras High Court has established a special investigation team to probe the stampede that occurred during Vijay's rally, which resulted in 41 fatalities.
Who is leading the SIT for the investigation?
The special investigation team is being led by IPS officer Asra Garg.
What criticisms did the court express?
The court criticized the rally organizers for their lack of responsibility in ensuring public safety and failing to assist during the stampede.
What recommendations has the court made for future events?
The court recommended that political rallies should have proper safety measures, including designated escape routes and adequate provisions for sanitation and drinking water.
Is there any further legal action expected?
The court has reserved its decision on the anticipatory bail pleas of the TVK leaders involved and has allowed the investigation to proceed.
Nation Press