Who Conferred the Title of Shankaracharya on Him?

Click to start listening
Who Conferred the Title of Shankaracharya on Him?

Synopsis

Mamta Kulkarni's bold remarks on Swami Avimukteshwaranand stir controversy during the Magh Mela. As tensions escalate, the legitimacy of the title 'Shankaracharya' is questioned amidst a clash with authorities. Explore the implications of this confrontation on spiritual authority and administrative regulation in India's religious landscape.

Key Takeaways

  • Mamta Kulkarni challenges Swami Avimukteshwaranand's legitimacy.
  • Original Shankaracharyas were known for their humility.
  • The clash at Magh Mela underscores tensions between spiritual and administrative realms.
  • Legal notices may affect the claim to the title 'Shankaracharya.'
  • Discussions on spiritual authority are reignited.

New Delhi, Jan 25 (NationPress) Former actress and Sadhvi Mamta Kulkarni has vehemently criticized Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati for his recent clash with authorities at Sangam Ghat during the ongoing Magh Mela.

In an interview with IANS, she questioned, “Who conferred upon him the title of the Supreme Shankaracharya? Due to his arrogance, I refuse to refer to him as Shankaracharya. The authentic Shankaracharya dates back to the 8th century, who founded the four Peeths and traveled extensively to uphold dharma across the universe.”

Kulkarni further challenged the seer's spiritual qualifications, asserting, “Merely being knowledgeable about the four Vedas does not qualify someone as a Shankaracharya. He lacks true self-awareness. A genuine Shankaracharya acts decisively upon realizing the truth, fully conscious of their actions.”

Commenting on the confrontation at Sangam Ghat, Kulkarni stated, “The blame rests entirely on him. I do not regard him as Shankaracharya; the fault lies with him. He should not be labeled a saint.”

She made comparisons to the original Shankaracharyas, highlighting their humility and the devotion of their followers, adding, “Take a look at the true Shankaracharyas; they were humble saints. I have observed in videos that their impoverished disciples often struggle even to articulate their thoughts properly, showcasing their inexperience.”

The controversy erupted during the revered Mauni Amavasya bathing festival at the Magh Mela in Prayagraj. Swami Avimukteshwaranand, who claims the title of Shankaracharya of the Northern Jyotir Math, attempted to make his way to the Sangam in a traditional palanquin.

The Prayagraj administration halted the procession, citing safety concerns and a “no-vehicle zone” policy. A resulting altercation between the Swami’s followers and the police led to accusations of mistreatment.

In response, Swami Avimukteshwaranand organized a high-profile dharna, refusing food and water until the administration issued an apology.

The standoff escalated when the Magh Mela Authority issued him a formal legal notice, questioning his entitlement to the title “Shankaracharya.” This incident has reignited discussions about legitimacy, religious protocols, and the fragile equilibrium between spiritual authority and administrative oversight at one of India’s oldest and largest religious gatherings.

Point of View

The clash between traditional spiritual authority and modern administrative regulations is becoming increasingly evident. Mamta Kulkarni's remarks reflect a growing skepticism towards self-proclaimed spiritual leaders. It is crucial to examine these dynamics with an unbiased lens to uphold the integrity of spiritual discourse.
NationPress
25/01/2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What sparked Mamta Kulkarni's criticism of Swami Avimukteshwaranand?
Her criticism arose from his confrontation with authorities at Sangam Ghat during the Magh Mela.
What does Mamta Kulkarni say about the title of Shankaracharya?
She questions who appointed him as Shankaracharya and emphasizes the historical significance of the original Shankaracharya.
What incident occurred at the Magh Mela?
The Prayagraj administration halted Swami Avimukteshwaranand's palanquin procession, leading to a confrontation with his followers.
What action did Swami Avimukteshwaranand take in response to the incident?
He staged a dharna, refusing food and water until an apology was issued by the administration.
What broader issues does this controversy highlight?
It raises questions about legitimacy, religious protocol, and the balance of spiritual authority and administrative regulation.
Nation Press