What Actions is Meghalaya HC Commending Regarding Stray Dogs?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Significant progress has been made by the Meghalaya government in addressing the stray dog issue.
- District-level committees have been established for effective management.
- Public awareness campaigns are being conducted to inform the community.
- Shelters for stray dogs are being set up to enhance public safety.
- The High Court is actively monitoring the situation to ensure compliance with animal welfare laws.
Shillong, Aug 6 (NationPress) The Meghalaya High Court has shown satisfaction with the state government's measures to tackle the growing issue of stray dogs, highlighting that significant progress has been made in addressing this concern statewide.
A division bench led by Chief Justice IP Mukerji and Justice W Diengdoh, during the hearing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on Wednesday, acknowledged the government's initiatives, stating in its order, “We are pleased to observe from a report submitted in Court today that considerable action has been executed by the government regarding the stray dog menace.”
The court report indicated that committees under Rule 4 of the Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules, 2001, have been established in every district of Meghalaya, including remote areas like South Garo Hills and West Jaintia Hills.
These district-level committees are essential in executing sterilisation, vaccination, and management programs for stray dogs in accordance with national guidelines.
The court also commended the state government's initiatives aimed at raising public awareness of this issue.
According to the submissions from the Additional Advocate General, the government has initiated awareness campaigns, rabies vaccination drives, and sterilisation projects. Shelters are also being established, where feasible, to accommodate stray dogs and minimize their interactions with the public.
Moreover, authorities have begun registering pet dogs to enhance tracking and accountability, another action that the court has welcomed as part of comprehensive animal welfare and public safety strategies.
The High Court is continuously monitoring the situation through regular hearings, ensuring compliance with the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, and the Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules, 2001.
Petitioner Kaustav Paul, who initially raised this issue in court, has been granted time until August 25, 2025, to respond to the government’s report. The next hearing is scheduled for August 28, 2025, when the court is anticipated to make a final decision based on submissions from both parties.