Meghwal: INDIA bloc's Nov 1 rally reopens 1984 Sikh massacre wounds

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Meghwal: INDIA bloc's Nov 1 rally reopens 1984 Sikh massacre wounds

Synopsis

Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal has launched a multi-pronged attack on the INDIA bloc's 1 November rally at Ramlila Maidan — invoking the 1984 anti-Sikh massacre, alleging Rahul Gandhi is engineering anarchy, accusing bloc members of contradicting themselves on EVMs and SIR, and demanding a public apology from Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge for remarks about the Prime Minister's late father.

Key Takeaways

Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal on 28 October 2026 criticised the INDIA bloc for scheduling its rally on 1 November , calling it a reopening of the wounds of the 1984 anti-Sikh massacre .
Meghwal alleged that some INDIA bloc partners themselves opposed the date but that Rahul Gandhi refused to reconsider.
The minister argued the rally disrupts Diwali festive trade and cited India’s growth rate of 7.8 per cent to rebut Gandhi’s ‘dead economy’ claim.
Meghwal accused the Congress of contradicting itself on EVMs and SIR , noting the party’s own leaders in Kerala credited SIR for their wins.
He demanded that Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge apologise for remarks about PM Modi’s late father, calling the language ‘vulgar’ and unbecoming of a senior leader.

Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal on Wednesday, 28 October 2026, sharply criticised the INDIA bloc for scheduling its rally at Ramlila Maidan in New Delhi on 1 November, asserting that the chosen date would reopen the wounds of the 1984 anti-Sikh massacre and amount to rubbing salt in them. Meghwal also accused Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi of deliberately attempting to create an atmosphere of anarchy and unrest in the country.

Meghwal's Remarks on the Rally Date

Meghwal said the Opposition parties should have factored in the historical weight of 1 November before fixing it as the date for their protest. “November 1 is reopening the wounds of the Sikh massacre that took place after October 31, 1984, and rubbing salt into them. At the very least, they should not have chosen November 1 for this decision. They do not want to make decisions in the national interest. They want to spread anarchy and unrest in the country. This is Rahul Gandhi’s only objective,” he said.

The minister further claimed that factions within the INDIA bloc itself were uncomfortable with the date but alleged that Rahul Gandhi had refused to reconsider. “Some parties within their INDIA bloc also disagree with holding the rally on November 1. But Rahul Gandhi acts like an emperor. Once he has decided that the protest will be held on November 1, then it will be held on November 1. They have also rejected the traders’ protest and ignored their opposition,” Meghwal said.

Impact on Traders and the Festive Economy

Meghwal questioned the timing of the rally, arguing that it fell during the peak Diwali festive season, when markets typically witness their highest annual footfall and sales volumes. He alleged that scheduling a large protest in the heart of the capital at this juncture risked disrupting trade and commercial activity at its busiest point in the calendar.

Responding to Rahul Gandhi’s characterisation of the Indian economy as a ‘dead economy’, Meghwal cited a growth rate of 7.8 per cent as a direct rebuttal. “Perhaps they chose November 1, around Diwali, to disturb the economy and harm the growing economy. Traders are protesting, but they are ignoring them as well,” he added.

EVM and Electoral Roll Controversy

On the Congress and INDIA bloc repeatedly raising questions about Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, Meghwal pointed to what he described as a glaring contradiction in the Opposition’s position. He noted that Congress leaders in Kerala had attributed their own electoral victories to the SIR process, even as the party nationally questioned its fairness.

“When you do it, it is fine, but when we do it, it is wrong. What kind of contradiction is this in their conduct?” he asked, also referencing Congress-governed states including Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, and Telangana as examples of elections where EVMs had delivered results in the party’s favour.

Election Commission Meeting Row

Meghwal also addressed the episode involving the Opposition’s attempt to meet the Election Commission of India (ECI), accusing Rahul Gandhi of defaming constitutional institutions on the basis of “false and baseless facts.” He claimed the ECI had asked the Opposition to provide a list of attendees before scheduling an appointment, but alleged that the bloc sought to arrive with 300 MPs without furnishing the required list. The group subsequently gathered near the Akashvani premises and later met the President, he said.

“If 10 people could go and meet the President, then 10 people could also have met the Election Commission,” Meghwal said, adding that Congress leaders later claimed the President had accepted their points without presenting evidence to support their allegations.

Kharge Remarks on PM Modi’s Father

Meghwal demanded an apology from Congress president and Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge for remarks he made about Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s father. He described the comments as deeply inappropriate for a senior leader and a national president of a major political party.

“I have never seen such vulgar language from a person in public life. This shows how much hatred he has in his heart for the Prime Minister. You can oppose him, you can make sarcastic remarks, but will you abuse his father, who is no longer in this world? Kharge will have to apologise to the country; the people will not forgive him,” Meghwal said.

The political temperature in New Delhi is set to remain elevated as the 1 November rally approaches, with both the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the INDIA bloc sharpening their positions ahead of the event.

Point of View

But its deployment against a specific protest date sharpens the attack. The contradiction charge on EVMs and SIR is the more substantive political point — it directly undermines the Opposition's electoral-process critique using the Opposition's own words. The demand for Kharge's apology over remarks about the Prime Minister's father, meanwhile, shifts the news cycle from the rally's substance to the Congress president's conduct, a dynamic that benefits the ruling party.
NationPress
28 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why has Arjun Ram Meghwal objected to the INDIA bloc rally on November 1?
Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal says 1 November is historically associated with the 1984 anti-Sikh massacre that followed the assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on 31 October 1984, and that holding a political rally on that date amounts to reopening those wounds. He has called on the Opposition to reconsider the date out of sensitivity toward the Sikh community.
What is the INDIA bloc planning at Ramlila Maidan on November 1?
The INDIA bloc has scheduled a large opposition rally at Ramlila Maidan in New Delhi on 1 November. The event is intended as a show of political strength, though the ruling BJP has questioned both its timing — close to Diwali — and the date’s historical significance.
What did Meghwal say about Rahul Gandhi and the INDIA bloc’s internal divisions?
Meghwal claimed that some constituent parties within the INDIA bloc were themselves opposed to holding the rally on 1 November but that Rahul Gandhi refused to change the date. He described Gandhi as acting ‘like an emperor’ who dismisses dissenting voices within his own alliance.
Why is Meghwal demanding an apology from Mallikarjun Kharge?
Meghwal has demanded that Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge apologise for remarks Kharge made about Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s late father. He described the comments as vulgar and unbecoming of a senior leader, saying the public would not forgive such personal attacks.
What contradiction has Meghwal highlighted regarding the Congress and EVMs?
Meghwal pointed out that Congress leaders in Kerala had publicly credited the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls for the party’s victories there, even as the national Congress leadership has criticised the SIR process. He also questioned how the party could allege EVM manipulation while winning elections in Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, and Telangana.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest Yesterday
  2. Yesterday
  3. Yesterday
  4. 3 days ago
  5. 4 days ago
  6. 4 days ago
  7. 5 days ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google