Mithun Chakraborty Advocates for President's Rule in Bengal Amid Violence (IANS Interview)

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Mithun Chakraborty has called for President's Rule in West Bengal.
- He accuses the state government of facilitating violence against Hindus.
- Chakraborty emphasizes the need for Army deployment for public safety.
- He highlights the plight of displaced Hindus living in temporary shelters.
- Chakraborty expresses concern over the law and order situation in Bengal.
New Delhi, April 19 (NationPress) In light of the recent violent incidents in West Bengal's Murshidabad district, BJP leader and actor Mithun Chakraborty has urgently called for the immediate enforcement of President’s Rule in the state, highlighting the critical need for Army intervention to ensure public safety.
During an exclusive conversation with IANS, Chakraborty expressed grave concerns regarding the deteriorating law and order situation in West Bengal, accusing the state government of permitting targeted violence against Hindus.
Here's the complete interview:
IANS: Are Hindus intentionally being targeted in Bengal?
Mithun Chakraborty: Your question already provides the answer. The recent Waqf Act is merely an excuse; the underlying agenda is distinct. While the new Waqf Act is intended for our Muslim brothers and sisters, the reality is that political leaders have appropriated lands for their personal gain, constructing warehouses or leasing them for profit. Had this revenue been utilized to uplift the Muslim community and aid their women, the situation would be different. Instead, leaders are indulging themselves.
Hindus have been uprooted, their homes obliterated. They never resisted or protested, yet their residences have been torched and destroyed. Currently, they are subsisting on 'khichdi' in makeshift accommodations. What was their sin?
IANS: Should it be inferred that Muslims have been granted a free pass under Mamata Banerjee's administration, leading to such occurrences?
Mithun Chakraborty: If Madam decided to act, everything could be resolved swiftly. She hasn't held anyone accountable yet. Regardless, the current scenario in Bengal shows that Sanatani, Christian, and Sikh communities will not support this party. Now, with time running out, they are trying to appease their voter base. Hence, even in the face of wrongdoing, they refrain from taking action to keep them satisfied, irrespective of casualties.
IANS: Can we conclude that Hindus have become refugees in Bengal?
Mithun Chakraborty: Absolutely. They have become refugees because everything here operates through hooliganism. We are not advocating for riots or conflicts; we only desire fair elections, yet that is obstructed.
IANS: What is your perspective on the West Bengal police's role? Do you believe they have been instructed to ignore incidents involving Muslims?
Mithun Chakraborty: The police seem to attend events merely to observe. In instances of riots and disturbances, they arrive with chairs, sit, and watch the chaos unfold. They appear to enjoy the spectacle before departing. Their job seems to be to keep their eyes closed while chaos reigns.
IANS: Do you think President's Rule should be enacted in Bengal?
Mithun Chakraborty: If this situation persists, then absolutely, and as soon as possible. I have repeatedly requested this and continue to appeal to the Home Minister via you. At the very least, the military should be deployed for two months during the elections. Their presence could ensure a fair election. Whatever transpires afterward can occur. But from the day the Election Commission announces the election date until a month post-results, the military must remain, as their victory could trigger another massacre. Hence, my urgent request.
IANS: Do you believe the Army is necessary in Bengal at this moment?
Mithun Chakraborty: Given the current circumstances, there is an immediate requirement for the Army. The ongoing situation undoubtedly calls for military involvement.
IANS: The Governor has been visiting areas affected by violence lately. What are your thoughts on that?
Mithun Chakraborty: He should have acted sooner; his delay is concerning. They were obstructing his efforts. The populace does not seek money; they desire the assurance that someone stands with them, that they won’t be abandoned. We wish to move freely, but they restrain us. It’s a deeply distressing situation.
IANS: Who do you believe is primarily accountable for the riots? Who is the face behind it?
Mithun Chakraborty: I have consistently stated that the Waqf Bill serves as mere pretext. It is a façade concealing a different agenda. This is the reason for the riots. Who is behind this? Madam claims she will not permit land acquisition; why does she persist in saying that? Is she above our President? No, she is merely one Chief Minister among 28 states. Both houses have endorsed the Bill, and the President has ratified it. She was present in the House herself.
She has served as a minister and possesses greater legal knowledge than we do. Yet, she insists she will prevent it. If she refuses and the directive to seize the land is issued, when it comes time to execute that order, riots will erupt again. Then it will become clear who is responsible and why.
IANS: Speaking directly, Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta stated in an IANS interview that Mamata Banerjee is to blame for the violence in West Bengal. Do you concur?
Mithun Chakraborty: She is speaking candidly, as she is the Chief Minister. I will also express my views soon, and when I do, it will bear consequences for many. That is all I will convey for now; I am merely biding my time.
IANS: Final question. Are you considering a visit to the violence-stricken areas?
Mithun Chakraborty: I desire to go, but I have not yet received authorization.