Mahua Moitra files complaint against 8 BJP workers over Tehatta egg attack

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Mahua Moitra files complaint against 8 BJP workers over Tehatta egg attack

Synopsis

TMC MP Mahua Moitra has filed a police complaint naming eight BJP activists — including local panchayat chiefs — over an egg attack on her convoy in Tehatta, Nadia. The BJP denies involvement, attributing the incident to spontaneous public anger over her remarks on Hindu deities. A parallel row has erupted over whether the station officer was even informed of her visit.

Key Takeaways

Mahua Moitra , TMC MP from Krishnanagar , filed a complaint at Tehatta Police Station on 18 September 2026 .
The complaint names eight BJP activists , including the panchayat samiti chief and deputy chief of Tehatta-I block .
The alleged egg attack occurred on 16 September as Moitra's convoy left a party meeting in Tehatta, Nadia district .
Police have begun examining CCTV and video footage of the incident.
BJP legislator Subrata Kobiraj denied all allegations, calling the incident a spontaneous public reaction.
Moitra separately accused police officer Supriya Ranjan Maji of falsely claiming he was not informed of her visit.

Trinamool Congress (TMC) Lok Sabha member Mahua Moitra, representing the Krishnanagar constituency in Nadia district, West Bengal, on Friday, 18 September 2026, filed a formal complaint at Tehatta Police Station against eight Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) activists over an alleged egg attack on her convoy during a party meeting visit on 16 September. Police have confirmed that an investigation is underway.

Who Has Been Named

Among the eight BJP activists named in the complaint are the panchayat samiti chief and deputy chief of Tehatta-I block — both locally influential figures within the BJP's organisational structure in Nadia. A district police officer confirmed the complaint and said authorities have begun examining CCTV and video footage of the incident to establish the sequence of events.

BJP Denies Involvement

The BJP's Nadia district leadership has flatly rejected the allegations. Subrata Kobiraj, BJP legislator from Tehatta Assembly Constituency, told reporters that no BJP worker or supporter was involved in the incident. He argued that Moitra's reportedly controversial remarks about Hindu deities had generated strong public anger, and that what occurred on 16 September was a spontaneous expression of that sentiment — not an organised attack by party functionaries.

What Moitra Said

Moitra shared videos of the incident on social media, alleging that BJP office-bearers had encircled the venue of her party meeting and pelted eggs at her convoy as she left. Drawing on a recent observation by Supreme Court judge Justice Dipankar Datta — who reportedly remarked that politicians should not be overly troubled by egg attacks when freedom fighters once faced bullets — Moitra said she had confronted the situation in the same spirit.

'BJP office-bearers, not the public, surrounded my meeting and pelted eggs as I left. Thank you, MiLord, for upholding our Constitutional protections,' she said. She also described herself, in that moment, as both a sitting Member of Parliament and a freedom fighter in the spirit of India's democratic tradition.

Row Over Police Communication

Moitra also levelled a separate allegation against the officer-in-charge of Tehatta Police Station, Supriya Ranjan Maji, who reportedly claimed on camera that no one had informed him of her visit. Moitra countered that the Nadia district superintendent of police had issued a formal letter — with a copy marked to Maji — about her Tehatta schedule. 'Does Mr Maji also have the BJP disease of short-term memory loss? Disgraceful,' she said, sharpening the political charge around the episode.

Broader Context

This incident is the latest in a series of confrontations between TMC and BJP in West Bengal ahead of electoral cycles in the state. Nadia district, which has seen competitive electoral battles between the two parties, has become a flashpoint for ground-level political tensions. The complaint and the accompanying allegations of police lapses add a law-and-order dimension to what was already a politically charged episode.

Point of View

Competing narratives, and an allegation of police complicity — each side weaponising the other's version. What is notable here is Moitra's decision to name panchayat-level BJP office-bearers rather than fringe elements, which signals an intent to push the case into administrative accountability territory. The additional allegation against the station officer — contradicted, she claims, by documentary evidence — raises questions about ground-level policing that deserve independent scrutiny, separate from the political noise surrounding it.
NationPress
18 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Mahua Moitra egg attack case about?
On 16 September 2026, TMC Lok Sabha MP Mahua Moitra alleged that BJP office-bearers surrounded the venue of her party meeting in Tehatta, Nadia district, and pelted eggs at her convoy as she departed. She subsequently filed a complaint at Tehatta Police Station on 18 September naming eight BJP activists.
Who has been named in Mahua Moitra's complaint?
Eight BJP activists have been named, including the panchayat samiti chief and deputy chief of Tehatta-I block in Nadia district. These are locally prominent figures within the BJP's organisational hierarchy.
What is the BJP's response to the allegations?
BJP legislator Subrata Kobiraj denied that any BJP worker or supporter was involved, attributing the incident to spontaneous public anger over Moitra's reportedly controversial remarks about Hindu deities. The party's Nadia district leadership has rejected the allegations entirely.
What action has the police taken so far?
Nadia district police have confirmed that an investigation has been initiated based on Moitra's complaint. Authorities are examining CCTV and video footage of the incident to determine what occurred.
Why did Mahua Moitra criticise the Tehatta police officer?
Moitra alleged that Tehatta Police Station officer-in-charge Supriya Ranjan Maji claimed on camera that he had not been informed of her visit, while she asserted that the Nadia district superintendent of police had issued a formal letter — with a copy to Maji — about her schedule. She called the claim 'disgraceful'.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 days ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 2 months ago
  8. 3 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google