Mahua Moitra moves Calcutta HC over egg attack, alleges Nadia police inaction
Synopsis
Mahua Moitra has taken her egg-attack complaint to the Calcutta High Court, accusing Nadia police of inaction — only for the court to admit the petition but deny her an urgent hearing. With BJP denying involvement and blaming TMC's own internal factionalism, the incident has opened a fresh front in West Bengal's volatile political landscape.
Key Takeaways
Mahua Moitra , TMC MP from Krishnanagar , approached the Calcutta High Court on 21 September 2026 over an alleged egg attack in Tehatta, Nadia district .
She accused Nadia district police of failing to arrest those responsible for the incident.
Justice Saugata Bhattacharya admitted the petition but declined an expedited hearing, directing it to follow the regular cause list.
Moitra alleged BJP office-bearers surrounded her meeting venue and attacked her convoy as she left.
BJP MLA Subrata Kobiraj denied party involvement, claiming the attack stemmed from internal TMC factional conflict in Nadia.
Trinamool Congress (TMC) Lok Sabha member Mahua Moitra on Monday, 21 September 2026, approached the Calcutta High Court, alleging that Nadia district police had failed to arrest those responsible for an egg attack on her in Tehatta, West Bengal. The court admitted her petition but declined to grant an expedited hearing, directing that the matter be taken up in accordance with the scheduled cause list.
What Happened in Tehatta
Moitra, who represents the Krishnanagar Lok Sabha constituency, had travelled to Tehatta to attend a party meeting. The alleged egg attack reportedly occurred as she was leaving the venue. She subsequently shared videos of the incident on social media, alleging that BJP office-bearers had surrounded the meeting venue and targeted her convoy as it departed.
The attack is said to have occurred last week, with Moitra accusing BJP workers of being behind it. Nadia district police, however, had reportedly made no arrests in connection with the incident — the primary grievance she placed before the High Court.
Court's Response
A single-judge bench of Justice Saugata Bhattacharya admitted Moitra's petition but declined her plea for an urgent, expedited hearing. The court instead directed that the case be listed and heard as per the regular cause list, effectively placing it in the standard queue without special priority.
Moitra Invokes Supreme Court Remark
In her remarks following the court appearance, Moitra referenced a recent observation by Supreme Court judge Justice Dipankar Datta, who had noted that politicians should not be overly concerned about egg attacks given that freedom fighters once faced bullets. Moitra said she had confronted the situation in that same spirit.
'BJP office bearers (NOT public) surrounded my meeting and pelted eggs as I left. Thank you, MiLord, for upholding our Constitutional protections,' the Krishnanagar MP said, characterising herself simultaneously as an MP and a freedom fighter.
BJP Denies Involvement, Points to TMC Factionalism
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) legislator from Tehatta, Subrata Kobiraj, flatly denied any party involvement in the incident. Kobiraj instead attributed the attack to internal divisions within Trinamool Congress in Nadia district.
'This was the result of factional conflict within Trinamool Congress. Here, one group is backing Moitra, while another is against her. Trinamool Congress in Nadia is now divided into two groups, and an anti-Moitra group attacked her. BJP had nothing to do with it,' Kobiraj said.
What Happens Next
The Calcutta High Court is expected to take up Moitra's petition in due course as part of its regular schedule. The case will test whether the court compels Nadia police to act on her complaint. This incident adds to a pattern of political confrontations in West Bengal, where clashes between TMC and BJP workers have repeatedly drawn judicial scrutiny.
Point of View
However prominent the complainant, must join the queue. More significant is the competing narrative: if BJP's claim of intra-TMC factionalism holds any water, it would expose a fracture in Mamata Banerjee's West Bengal apparatus ahead of future electoral cycles. Moitra's invocation of Justice Datta's 'freedom fighter' remark is clever optics, but the real accountability question is simpler — why have the police made no arrests nearly a week after a sitting MP filed a complaint? That inaction, whatever its cause, is the story courts and voters should press on.
NationPress
21 Sept 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did Mahua Moitra approach the Calcutta High Court?
Mahua Moitra moved the Calcutta High Court alleging that Nadia district police had failed to arrest anyone responsible for an alleged egg attack on her in Tehatta, West Bengal. She filed the petition after police reportedly took no action on her complaint.
What was the Calcutta High Court's response to Moitra's petition?
Justice Saugata Bhattacharya admitted the petition but declined Moitra's request for an urgent, expedited hearing. The court directed that the matter be listed and heard in accordance with the regular cause list.
Who does Mahua Moitra blame for the egg attack?
Moitra alleged that BJP office-bearers surrounded the venue of her meeting in Tehatta and pelted eggs at her convoy as she was leaving. She also shared videos of the incident on social media to support her claim.
What is the BJP's position on the egg attack allegation?
BJP MLA Subrata Kobiraj denied any party involvement, attributing the attack to factional conflict within Trinamool Congress in Nadia district. He claimed an anti-Moitra faction within TMC was responsible, not BJP workers.
What is the significance of Justice Dipankar Datta's remark cited by Moitra?
Moitra referenced a Supreme Court observation by Justice Dipankar Datta that politicians should not be overly troubled by egg attacks when freedom fighters had faced bullets. She used the remark to frame her response as principled, saying she had faced the situation in the same spirit.
