Why Did the Opposition Walk Out During HM Shah's Reply?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a heated session of the Rajya Sabha, BJP President J.P. Nadda condemned the Opposition's walkout during Union Home Minister Amit Shah's response to the debate on Operation Sindoor. The exchange highlighted significant parliamentary practices and accusations of hypocrisy among the Opposition, drawing parallels with past events following the 2008 Mumbai attacks.
Key Takeaways
- Nadda criticizes Opposition for walkout during debate
- Operation Sindoor discussion draws historical parallels
- Allegations of double standards from the Opposition
- House adjourned due to ongoing disruptions
- Importance of parliamentary decorum highlighted
New Delhi, July 31 (NationPress) Leader of the Rajya Sabha and BJP president J.P. Nadda strongly criticized the Opposition for their decision to walk out during Union Home Minister Amit Shah's address in response to the debate on Operation Sindoor.
This remark was made just before the Upper House was suspended for the second time that day. The initial adjournment occurred at noon when the House convened at 11 a.m., with the Opposition causing a significant uproar.
As the Opposition members continued their sloganeering, Nadda highlighted important parliamentary precedents. He recalled how, during the UPA era, the then Home Minister delivered a speech in the Rajya Sabha regarding the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks, accusing the Opposition of displaying double standards.
He stated, "Yesterday, following an extensive discussion on Operation Sindoor, certain Opposition parties chose to walk out as soon as the Home Minister began his speech. I would like to remind the House of the situation after the Mumbai terrorist attacks in 2008, where discussions were held in both Houses concerning the statement from the Ministry of Home Affairs."
Nadda noted that during that period, the responses in the Lok Sabha were provided by both the then Home Minister and the Prime Minister, while in the Rajya Sabha, it was the then Home Minister who delivered the response.
He emphasized, "It was made clear during the BAC (Business Advisory Committee) meeting that it is the government's prerogative to decide which Minister should address the House in response to discussions."
Labeling the Opposition as hypocritical, Nadda remarked, "The Opposition had called for a discussion to gather information from the government regarding Operation Sindoor. Yet, when the opportunity arose, they opted to walk out instead of listening to the Home Minister."
He concluded that the Opposition's demands were misplaced and revealed their double standards.
Eventually, the House was adjourned again until 2:00 p.m. due to ongoing slogans.
Previously, the Opposition had staged a walkout on Wednesday, asserting that Prime Minister Narendra Modi should address the debate surrounding Operation Sindoor.
Point of View
It is crucial to analyze the recent events in the Rajya Sabha objectively. The walkout by the Opposition during a vital discussion on national security raises questions about their commitment to democratic processes. While the BJP's criticism points to a perceived hypocrisy, the importance of respectful discourse in Parliament cannot be overstated. The Nation stands for transparency and accountability in governance.
NationPress
21/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What triggered the walkout by the Opposition?
The Opposition staged a walkout during Union Home Minister Amit Shah's reply to the debate on Operation Sindoor, demanding that Prime Minister Narendra Modi respond instead.
What did J.P. Nadda say regarding parliamentary procedures?
Nadda emphasized that the government has the prerogative to decide which Minister responds in the House, citing past practices during the UPA era.
How did Nadda describe the Opposition's actions?
Nadda accused the Opposition of hypocrisy and pointed out their double standards by demanding a discussion but walking out when given the opportunity.
