Why Did the NIA Court Issue a Non-Bailable Warrant Against Hizbul Mujahideen’s Salahuddin?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Non-bailable warrant issued against Hizbul Mujahideen's Salahuddin.
- Charges include UAP Act violations.
- Salahuddin is currently believed to be in Pakistan.
- Legal actions reflect ongoing efforts to combat terrorism.
- Significant implications for national security.
Srinagar, December 20 (NationPress) A non-bailable warrant was issued by the NIA Special Court in the Budgam district of Jammu and Kashmir on Saturday against Mohammad Yusuf Shah, also known as Syed Salahuddin, who is the supreme commander of the Hizbul Mujahideen group.
The court's order stated that Mohammad Iqbal Rather, the Assistant Public Prosecutor (APP), requested the issuance of a non-bailable warrant against Mohammad Yusuf Shah, the son of Ghulam Rasool Shah, a resident of Bonpora Soibugh. This request was based on an application filed by the Investigating Officer (I.O) concerning FIR No. 331/2012, which included charges under Sections 13, 18, 20, 39 of the UAP Act and 506 of the RPC.
The APP noted that the accused is implicated in offenses under the stated sections of law, but has reportedly crossed the border and is currently in Pakistan.
The order highlighted that the APP further provided certificates from the SHO Police Station Budgam and the In-charge Police Post Soibugh, confirming that Salahuddin had infiltrated into Pakistan and could not be located. These certificates were included with the current application.
“The charges against Salahuddin stem from the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and involve crimes under Sections 13, 18, 20, 39 of the UAP Act, along with 506 of the RPC,” the order stated.
The NIA court mentioned that it, acting as the Court of Sessions, handles custody and bail matters primarily under Section 43-D (2) and (5) of the UAP Act.
“The court reviewed the CD, which indicates that sufficient evidence has been gathered that links the accused to the crimes under Sections 13, 18, 20, 39 of the UAP Act and 506 of the RPC,” the court noted.
The NIA court order specified that, according to the I.O.'s statement, the original CD has been forwarded to the Competent Authority for the necessary sanction, so the charge sheet can be presented in the competent court for trial in absentia.
The court concluded that it has sufficient grounds to believe that the accused is avoiding arrest, thus issuing a non-bailable warrant with instructions to the Jammu and Kashmir police to apprehend him in relation to FIR No. 331/2012 for the crimes under Sections 13, 18, 20, 39 of the UAP Act and 506 of the RPC.