Is There No Deadline for the SIT Investigation into Gaurav Gogoi's Alleged Pakistan Links?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Assam SIT has not set a deadline for the investigation.
- The inquiry centers on Gaurav Gogoi's alleged Pakistan ties.
- The investigation may be handed over to the NIA.
- Current limitations restrict access to communication records.
- The political implications are significant in the context of Assam's governance.
Guwahati, Sep 9 (NationPress) Assam's Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma stated on Tuesday that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) examining the supposed connections between Assam Pradesh Congress Committee (APCC) President and MP Gaurav Gogoi and Pakistan has not been allocated a definitive timeframe for the completion of its investigation.
"The SIT has not been given a specific deadline to finalize its findings," the Chief Minister informed reporters.
He further explained that once the investigation results are compiled, the report would undergo review by either himself or the Chief Secretary before any subsequent actions are determined.
These comments arise amidst an intensified political struggle in the state, with the BJP and Congress exchanging accusations related to this controversy.
While the Chief Minister has consistently claimed that "surprising disclosures" will emerge from the investigation, the Congress party has labeled the allegations as "politically driven".
Previously, CM Sarma indicated that the inquiry regarding Gaurav Gogoi and his spouse Elizabeth Coleburn's connections to Pakistan could potentially be handed over to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) following the SIT's final report.
The Chief Minister addressed the ongoing investigation into allegations linking Gogoi and his wife's supposed ties to Pakistan, acknowledging the limitations faced by the current SIT in Assam.
He pointed out that the Assam SIT has a restricted mandate, particularly in terms of accessing communication records.
"The SIT in Assam operates under a very limited framework. It cannot access telephone records or connections beyond two years," he emphasized.
Despite these limitations, the Chief Minister praised the SIT for diligently working within its constraints.
He reiterated that the larger implications of the case—related to citizenship and alleged associations with the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC)—are under the jurisdiction of the Union Ministry of Home Affairs.
Central investigation agencies such as the NIA, he noted, possess the capability to retrieve information dating back to 2010–2011.
CM Sarma clarified that the state government has not yet requested the NIA to take over the investigation.
"No such request has been made so far. We will make a final decision after the SIT submits its report," he stated.
Additionally, the Chief Minister noted: "The SIT has been tasked with completing the investigation by September 10, with no extensions permitted. The findings will be presented to the state Cabinet on September 11 or 12, after which a decision will be made—by September 15—on whether to transfer the case to the NIA, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), or place it under the authority of the Ministry of Home Affairs."