Why Did Punjab Police Arrest a Women Cell DSP for Bribery?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Corruption in law enforcement is being actively addressed by authorities.
- Bribery attempts can lead to serious legal consequences.
- The Vigilance Bureau plays a critical role in combating corruption.
- Transparency and accountability are essential in government roles.
- Public complaints can initiate investigations into corrupt practices.
Chandigarh, July 4 (NationPress) In a significant move against corruption within government sectors, the Punjab Police apprehended its Deputy Superintendent of Police (Crime Against Women), Rajanpal, who was stationed in Faridkot town on Friday.
Authorities reported that the detained officer attempted to offer a bribe of Rs one lakh to officials in the office of the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) in a bid to dismiss a corruption complaint lodged against him.
“Following this incident, a First Information Report (FIR) was filed under the Prevention of Corruption Act, leading to the officer's arrest,” stated a senior police representative.
He was charged under the anti-corruption statute, and directives were issued for departmental proceedings against him.
In a related endeavor to combat corruption, the state Vigilance Bureau on Monday detained Head Constable Raj Kumar, who served as the personal security officer to DSP Bhucho in the Bathinda district, while he was in the act of accepting a bribe of Rs one lakh.
A spokesperson for the government indicated that the arrest of the implicated police officer followed a complaint made by a resident of Kalyan Sukha village in Nathana tehsil of Bathinda district.
The spokesperson noted that the female complainant approached the Vigilance Bureau alleging that, due to a conflict over agricultural land, the opposing party had filed a false case against her husband and both of her sons at the Nathana police station, which was under investigation by the DSP of Bhucho.
Subsequently, reader Raj Kumar made two calls from her mobile number, revealing he had communicated with the DSP regarding this re-investigation, and that the DSP’s signature on the report was the only thing outstanding. To facilitate the case’s dismissal, he demanded a bribe of Rs two lakh. Raj Kumar instructed the complainant that Rs one lakh should be paid immediately as an initial installment to expedite the process. The complainant recorded this conversation on her mobile device and presented it to the Vigilance Bureau.