Ram Temple trust denies missing funds; RSS, seers slam Akhilesh Yadav

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Ram Temple trust denies missing funds; RSS, seers slam Akhilesh Yadav

Synopsis

The Ram Temple trust has pushed back hard against Akhilesh Yadav's allegation of missing crores from devotee offerings, saying a routine SBI-supervised audit is underway and nothing untoward has surfaced. With the RSS and Ayodhya seers piling on, and SP doubling down without producing evidence, the row has quickly become a proxy political battle ahead of Uttar Pradesh elections.

Key Takeaways

The Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra trust denied on 7 June that crores of rupees from temple offerings are missing.
The trust said a routine internal audit involving State Bank of India representatives is currently in progress and has found 'nothing noteworthy' so far.
RSS National Executive Member Indresh Kumar called Yadav's allegation a 'false statement' made without evidence.
Ayodhya seers Mahant Sitaram Das Maharaj and Arya Sant Varun Das Ji Maharaj accused Akhilesh Yadav of misguiding Hindus and 'harassing' Ram devotees.
SP leader Tej Narayan Pandey backed Yadav's claim, alleging the trust's conduct has been 'questionable from the beginning.' No documentary evidence has been made public by either side; the audit outcome is awaited.

The Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra trust on Sunday, 7 June flatly denied allegations by Samajwadi Party (SP) president Akhilesh Yadav that crores of rupees from devotee offerings at the Ram Temple in Ayodhya had gone missing. The denial was swiftly backed by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and prominent Hindu seers in Ayodhya, who accused Yadav of deliberately spreading misinformation ahead of state elections.

What the Trust Said

In an official statement, the trust clarified that a routine internal audit is currently in progress at the temple. 'The Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra undergoes internal audits from time to time. Representatives of the Trust and the State Bank of India participate in this process. The audit exercise continues for several days, and the same process is currently underway. So far, nothing noteworthy has come to light,' the statement read.

The trust's rebuttal directly contradicts Yadav's claim, which had been circulating in Ayodhya for two to three days before drawing an official response.

RSS and Seers Go on the Offensive

RSS National Executive Member Indresh Kumar said Yadav had 'developed a habit of making false statements and levelling allegations,' adding that he had 'neither been able to provide evidence nor is he likely to do so.' Kumar further remarked that certain forces — both globally and domestically — are 'uncomfortable with the idea of India becoming an educated, progressive, and harmonious nation,' and said he prayed that 'Lord Ram grant wisdom to Akhilesh Yadav.'

Mahant Sitaram Das Maharaj of Ayodhya's Saket Bhavan temple was sharper in his criticism, questioning why Yadav had never visited Ram Lalla for darshan or made any donation to the temple. He alleged that 'raising questions over it is an attempt to misguide Hindus' and called the spread of such news 'condemnable and unfortunate.'

Arya Sant Varun Das Ji Maharaj accused Yadav of 'harassing' Ram devotees, asserting that Yadav had 'no right or authority to speak on matters related to the Ram Temple.' He suggested that such narratives 'may emerge in view of the upcoming state elections.' Notably, however, Varun Das Maharaj also said an investigation into transparency would be appropriate, while maintaining that the likelihood of any wrongdoing at the temple was low.

SP Stands Firm

SP leader Tej Narayan Pandey stood by his party chief's allegation, calling the matter 'very unfortunate.' He alleged that the 'faith of people, in the form of offerings in donation boxes, has been betrayed,' and went further to claim that 'the conduct of the Trust has been questionable from the beginning, whether it is related to land scams or now the alleged multi-crore scam involving the donation box.' The SP has not produced documentary evidence to support these claims.

Political Context

The row erupts at a politically sensitive moment, with Uttar Pradesh watching closely as parties position themselves ahead of the next assembly election cycle. The Ram Temple — consecrated in January 2024 after decades of legal and political battles — has remained a charged symbol, and any allegation touching its administration carries outsized political weight. This is not the first time opposition parties have raised questions about the temple trust's functioning; critics argue such charges are difficult to verify without independent oversight, while supporters of the trust contend that audits with State Bank of India participation provide adequate accountability.

With the audit still ongoing, the trust has indicated it will share findings through proper channels once the process is complete.

Point of View

And the trust's denial, while categorical, offers no numbers. That ambiguity is the SP's asset and the trust's vulnerability. Notably, even one of the seers who attacked Yadav conceded that a transparency investigation would be appropriate, which inadvertently lends the allegation a sliver of legitimacy it might not otherwise have. The episode underscores a structural gap: the Ram Temple, one of India's highest-footfall religious sites, lacks a publicly accessible, independently audited financial disclosure framework. Until that changes, allegations like Yadav's will find oxygen regardless of their merit.
NationPress
24 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Akhilesh Yadav's allegation about the Ram Temple?
Akhilesh Yadav, president of the Samajwadi Party, alleged that crores of rupees from devotee offerings at the Ram Temple in Ayodhya have gone missing. The allegation had reportedly been circulating in Ayodhya for two to three days before the temple trust issued a formal denial on 7 June.
How did the Ram Temple trust respond to the missing-funds allegation?
The Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra trust said a routine internal audit is currently underway, conducted with the participation of State Bank of India representatives, and that 'nothing noteworthy has come to light' so far. It did not address the specific figure cited by Yadav.
What did the RSS say about Akhilesh Yadav's claim?
RSS National Executive Member Indresh Kumar said Yadav had 'developed a habit of making false statements' and had not provided — and was unlikely to provide — any evidence. Kumar also suggested the allegations reflected a broader discomfort with India's progress.
Did any religious figure support an investigation into the temple's finances?
Arya Sant Varun Das Ji Maharaj, while strongly criticising Yadav, said an investigation into the transparency of the temple's financial system would be appropriate, though he maintained that chances of actual wrongdoing at the temple were low.
What is the SP's position after the trust's denial?
SP leader Tej Narayan Pandey backed Akhilesh Yadav's allegation, claiming the trust's conduct has been 'questionable from the beginning' and citing past land-related controversies alongside the current donation-box allegation. The party has not publicly presented documentary evidence.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 weeks ago
  2. 2 weeks ago
  3. 2 weeks ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 1 month ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 1 month ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google