Can the Centre Develop a Long-term Strategy to Combat Pollution in Delhi-NCR?

Click to start listening
Can the Centre Develop a Long-term Strategy to Combat Pollution in Delhi-NCR?

Synopsis

The Supreme Court challenges the Centre to create a sustainable strategy to mitigate Delhi-NCR’s air pollution crisis, stressing that temporary measures are insufficient. The court's focus is on long-term solutions that consider both environmental health and economic livelihoods.

Key Takeaways

  • Supreme Court emphasizes need for a long-term pollution strategy.
  • The national capital cannot rely on short-term solutions.
  • Economic impacts of pollution measures must be considered.
  • Calls for emergency measures to address health risks.
  • Monitoring of air quality must be efficient and transparent.

New Delhi, Nov 17 (NationPress) The Supreme Court on Monday urged the Centre to formulate a comprehensive plan to address the persistent air pollution issue in the Delhi-NCR region.

A Bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai instructed the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and the Delhi government to submit a thorough proposal. The court emphasized that the national capital cannot keep depending on temporary measures every winter.

“Suggestions must extend beyond two days, one week, or three weeks. We need a long-term solution that enables gradual improvement each year,” the Bench, including Justices K. Vinod Chandran and N.V. Anjaria, explained to Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Aishwarya Bhati.

During the proceedings, the apex court stated it was not inclined to enforce “drastic or hasty measures” like an all-year construction ban, as such actions would significantly impact livelihoods.

“We lack the expertise to determine which activities should cease entirely. A substantial portion of the population relies on these activities. We cannot focus on just one aspect,” remarked the CJI Gavai-led Bench.

Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, representing the intervenors, implored the Supreme Court to implement immediate measures, asserting: “Three out of ten fatalities in Delhi are linked to air pollution. A PM2.5 particle entering my child’s lungs will never leave. This demands stringent actions.”

Sankaranarayanan highlighted the necessity to activate the GRAP at significantly lower AQI levels and to enforce restrictions on construction.

Nonetheless, the CJI Gavai-led Bench reiterated that a complete shutdown would result in “a total halt” for the city.

“Then even the courts would have to cease operations,” the apex court noted, adding that it would not issue “bold directives” without solutions supported by experts.

Scheduling the next hearing for November 19, the Supreme Court also requested an affidavit from the Delhi government regarding the nature and efficacy of AQI monitoring equipment, in light of media reports about water sprinkling near monitoring stations.

“Please have it ready by the day after tomorrow,” the CJI Gavai-led Bench ordered.

Point of View

The Supreme Court's insistence on a long-term strategy reflects a growing recognition of the severity of Delhi-NCR's air pollution crisis. As the nation grapples with environmental health issues, a balanced approach that prioritizes both public health and economic activity is essential. The court's cautious stance towards extreme measures highlights the complexity of the issue, advocating for solutions that are sustainable and considerate of all stakeholders involved.
NationPress
17/11/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Supreme Court demand from the Centre regarding pollution?
The Supreme Court demanded that the Centre devise a long-term strategy to effectively address the persistent air pollution crisis in the Delhi-NCR region.
What is GRAP and why is it significant?
The Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP) is a set of measures aimed at mitigating air pollution. Its significance lies in its potential to address pollution levels proactively, rather than reactively.
Why is the court against temporary measures?
The court believes that temporary measures are insufficient to tackle the ongoing air pollution crisis and insists on solutions that will lead to gradual improvement each year.
Nation Press