Did the SC issue notice on a plea from MP journalists alleging police threats?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Supreme Court has taken action on a plea from journalists in Madhya Pradesh alleging police brutality over their investigative reporting. This situation raises serious concerns about the safety of journalists and the integrity of law enforcement in the region, highlighting the ongoing struggle against illegal activities and corruption.
Key Takeaways
- The Supreme Court issued a notice on the plea from two Madhya Pradesh journalists.
- Allegations include police brutality and threats to their lives.
- There is a call for the inclusion of the Bhind SP in the legal proceedings.
- The case highlights the challenges faced by journalists in India.
- It underscores the importance of judicial protection for the press.
New Delhi, June 4 (NationPress) The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued notice regarding a petition submitted by two journalists from Madhya Pradesh who claimed they were physically attacked at the behest of the Bhind Superintendent of Police due to their reports on illegal sand mining in the Chambal River.
However, a panel of Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma opted not to grant any interim protection to the petitioners, journalists Shashikant Jatav and Amarkant Singh Chouhan, against any coercive actions.
Justice Karol's bench stated, "If you commit a crime such as murder, can we issue an order preventing any coercive action? We are unaware of the specific crimes registered against you."
It emphasized that before any interim order, the Madhya Pradesh government should present the facts of the case.
The apex court instructed the petitioners’ attorney to include Bhind’s SP as a party to the petition, noting that it is “very easy” to make allegations against an IPS officer without officially including him in the legal proceedings.
The case is scheduled for further hearing next Monday.
During the proceedings, the Supreme Court remarked: “We value your role as the fourth pillar of democracy; we also assure you that if there is a threat to your life, we will protect you.”
In their writ petition filed with the Supreme Court, the journalists, who reportedly face severe threats to their lives from the Bhind police, argued that they were compelled to leave their hometown due to these threats and felt unsafe approaching the Madhya Pradesh High Court, thus necessitating a direct appeal to the Supreme Court.
The petition underscored that the two reporters have a solid history of fearless journalism, particularly concerning corruption and illegal activities, notably illegal sand mining in the Chambal River, allegedly conducted with the complicity of local police. The petitioners identified IPS officer Asit Yadav and his subordinates as main offenders, asserting that the targeting is retaliatory, stemming from their investigative efforts. The journalists reported facing severe threats to their lives, including custodial assault, caste-based abuse, kidnapping, and ongoing harassment from the Bhind police.
Point of View
It is imperative to recognize the challenges faced by journalists in their pursuit of truth and accountability. This case underscores the critical importance of safeguarding freedom of the press, which is essential for a healthy democracy. The judiciary's role in ensuring protection for journalists is vital in upholding public trust and combating corruption.
NationPress
09/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted the Supreme Court to issue a notice?
The Supreme Court issued a notice in response to a plea by two journalists from Madhya Pradesh alleging physical assault by police due to their reporting on illegal sand mining.
What are the main allegations made by the journalists?
The journalists allege that they faced severe threats to their lives and were forced to flee their hometown due to coercive actions from the Bhind police.
Who are the key figures involved in this case?
The case involves journalists Shashikant Jatav and Amarkant Singh Chouhan, and IPS officer Asit Yadav, who the journalists claim is a perpetrator of the alleged abuse.
What is the role of the Supreme Court in protecting journalists?
The Supreme Court plays a crucial role in safeguarding journalists' rights and ensuring their safety in the face of threats, thereby upholding the freedom of the press.
When is the next hearing scheduled?
The next hearing of the case is scheduled for Monday.
