Why Did the SC Reject the Plea for NEP in TN, Kerala, and Bengal?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court has dismissed a plea aimed at directing Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and West Bengal to implement the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. This decision raises critical questions about educational policy and state responsibilities in India.
Key Takeaways
- The Supreme Court has dismissed the plea for NEP implementation in Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and West Bengal.
- The court emphasized its limited role in compelling state actions.
- Three states have yet to sign the MoU necessary for NEP funding.
- The NEP aims to enhance educational standards in India.
- Political views on the NEP vary significantly among state leaders.
New Delhi, May 9 (NationPress) The Supreme Court has dismissed a plea requesting guidance for the states of Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and West Bengal to adopt the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. A panel comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan stated that the Supreme Court, while exercising its writ authority, is unable to directly mandate any state government to embrace the NEP.
Justice Pardiwala's bench noted, “The court could intervene if a state's actions or lack thereof concerning the National Education Policy infringe upon any fundamental rights. However, we won't delve into this matter in this writ petition,” while dismissing the plea presented by advocate G.S. Mani, who represented himself.
According to media reports, the plea highlighted that five states, including Odisha, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Delhi, have not yet formalized the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Union Ministry of Education, while 30 states and union territories have completed this process.
“Due to changes in government in Odisha and the Union Territory of Delhi, only three states remain—Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and West Bengal—that have not signed the MoU with the Union government,” the plea stated.
Furthermore, the plea asserted that this MoU is crucial for executing the National Education Policy and obtaining approximately Rs 13,000 crore over the subsequent three years through the Centre's key initiative for state-run higher education.
The Tamil Nadu Chief Minister's assertion that the NEP undermines social equity, attacks the Tamil language, and is detrimental to the interests of the Tamil population is described as fundamentally flawed, arbitrary, politically charged, and contrary to the fundamental right to quality education and the learning of Tamil and other languages by Indian children.
“The state government's refusal or failure to implement the National Educational Policy (NEP) from the Central Government or sign an MoU could jeopardize public interest or infringe upon citizens' rights. The state government bears a constitutional and legal responsibility to implement the NEP 2020 of the Central Government and to enter into an MoU for executing this policy, scheme, or project,” the petition emphasized.
The plea further explained that the Union Ministry of Human Resource Development introduced the New National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 to enhance the quality of education in India by prioritizing holistic growth, critical reasoning, and skill acquisition, while also emphasizing foundational literacy and numeracy.
Point of View
We recognize the Supreme Court's decision as a significant moment in the ongoing discourse surrounding education in India. It's crucial to uphold the principles of autonomy and federalism while also ensuring that educational standards are met. The conversation around the NEP continues, and we must engage with all stakeholders to foster a productive educational environment.
NationPress
21/05/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the National Education Policy (NEP)?
The National Education Policy (NEP) aims to transform the education system in India by promoting holistic development, critical thinking, and skill development.
Why did the Supreme Court reject the plea?
The Supreme Court determined that it cannot compel state governments to adopt the NEP directly, although it can intervene if fundamental rights are violated.
Which states have not signed the MoU for NEP implementation?
As of now, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and West Bengal have not signed the Memorandum of Understanding with the Union Ministry of Education.
What are the implications of not signing the MoU?
Failing to sign the MoU may hinder the implementation of NEP and limit access to significant funding from the central government.
What does the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister say about the NEP?
The Tamil Nadu Chief Minister argues that the NEP undermines social justice and is detrimental to the Tamil language and culture.
