Did SC’s Observations on Bihar SIR Reflect the Opposition’s True Colors?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Supreme Court ruling upholds ECI's SIR drive.
- Concerns regarding illegal immigration affecting voter registration.
- BJP sees ruling as exposure of opposition's tactics.
- Next hearing set for July 28, 2023.
- Importance of transparency in electoral processes highlighted.
New Delhi, July 10 (NationPress) The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to halt the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) initiative being conducted by the Election Commission of India (ECI) in Bihar, affirming that the process is "entirely constitutional."
Moreover, the apex court emphasized the importance of "checks and balances" to guarantee fairness within a democratic framework.
BJP spokesperson Tuhin Sinha praised the court's comments and told IANS, "The opposition has been attempting to tarnish the Election Commission's reputation for days, but today’s ruling has held a mirror to them."
He asserted that illegal immigration has significantly affected Seemanchal districts like Araria, Katihar, Kishanganj, and Purnia, where Aadhar card registrations are reportedly 20-30% higher than the actual population.
"Who is behind this Aadhaar card fraud? If there is political backing, it can only stem from parties contesting the SIR initiative," Sinha stated, targeting the INDIA bloc.
He further mentioned that West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee endorses illegal immigration for vote bank strategies and expressed concern that extending the drive to Bengal would further unveil this connection.
Senior Advocate Barun Kumar Sinha, representing one of the petitioners, informed IANS that the Supreme Court, after an extensive hearing, opted not to issue any interim order, allowing the ECI to proceed with its operations.
"The court noted that the Election Commission might consider Aadhaar, ration card, and voter ID card, in addition to the documents specified in the current guidelines," he stated.
The next hearing is scheduled for July 28, with the ECI instructed to submit a counter affidavit by July 21. In response to the court’s comments, RJD MP Manoj Kumar Jha remarked that the worries expressed by Tejashwi Yadav have been validated.
“20 percent of Biharis are migrant workers - how will they return to provide documents?” he questioned.
He also pointed out that the SC, in its preliminary opinion, suggested that the ECI consider documents like Aadhaar and ration cards for voter verification.
This verdict signifies a crucial development in the politically charged discourse regarding voter list integrity in election-bound Bihar and is expected to escalate, given the Supreme Court’s intervention and observations made on July 10.