What’s Next for the High-Profile Single Lease Case Involving Shanti Dhariwal?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- The Rajasthan High Court is reviewing a critical corruption case.
- Former Minister Shanti Dhariwal is among the key figures involved.
- The Supreme Court has mandated a six-month resolution.
- The case has implications for public trust in governance.
- Legal proceedings are closely monitored due to their significance.
Jaipur, May 15 (NationPress) On Thursday, the Rajasthan High Court will continue its proceedings regarding the prominent single lease case involving former Minister Shanti Dhariwal, retired IAS officer G.S. Sandhu, and others.
The last hearing occurred on Wednesday, overseen by a bench led by Chief Justice M.M. Shrivastava, during which Sandhu articulated his position, asking the court to dismiss the case.
This case involves seven criminal petitions submitted by Dhariwal, Sandhu, RAS officer Nishkam Diwakar, and the former Deputy Commissioner Omkarmal Saini. These petitions are currently under review due to instructions from the Supreme Court, which mandated the High Court to resolve the issue within six months.
During the proceedings, Advocate S.S. Hora, representing Sandhu, informed the court that a 2005 application had requested a single lease for 3.43 hectares of land located in Todi Ramjanipura, Jaipur.
Since the area exceeded permissible limits, the Jaipur Development Authority (JDA) sent the request to the state government, which initially turned it down.
Nevertheless, the application re-emerged in 2009, and the lease was ultimately approved in 2011. It was later canceled in 2013, leading Ramsharan Singh to file a complaint with the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) in 2014.
Sandhu contended that no criminal offense had taken place and pointed out that the state government had previously sought the withdrawal of the case from the ACB court. He, therefore, asked the High Court to dismiss the ongoing proceedings.
The “single lease” or Ekal Patta case traces back to June 29, 2011, when the JDA granted a lease to Shailendra Garg of Ganpati Construction. The cancellation of this lease in 2013, following the ACB complaint, set off a lengthy investigation that resulted in the arrest of several senior officials, including Sandhu, Diwakar, and Saini. Dhariwal, who was serving as a minister at that time, was also interrogated regarding his potential involvement.
A significant development occurred on November 15, 2022, when the High Court provided Dhariwal with relief by quashing a protest petition and halting proceedings against him in the ACB special court. His legal team argued that he was neither mentioned in the original FIR nor in the charge sheet, and that the ACB’s closure report revealed no direct evidence implicating him.
Despite this, new petitions were filed in the Supreme Court seeking a thorough review. The apex court subsequently instructed the High Court to hasten the hearings and deliver a verdict within a six-month timeframe.