Shashank Singh denies assault charges in Bhopal, calls FIR an attempt to frame family

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Shashank Singh denies assault charges in Bhopal, calls FIR an attempt to frame family

Synopsis

IPL cricketer Shashank Singh is at the centre of an assault case in Bhopal, with an FIR naming him, his retired IPS father, and their driver. He denies all charges and claims the complainant faked being a cook and was recording videos inside their home. Police say the investigation is ongoing — and with a senior ex-cop among the accused, the case carries unusual institutional weight.

Key Takeaways

Ratibad police registered an FIR against cricketer Shashank Singh , his father retired DGP Shailesh Singh , and their driver on 30 June .
Complainant Vipendra Singh Tomar alleged assault, abuse, phone confiscation, and wrongful confinement at the family's Neelbad residence in Bhopal .
Tomar alleged he was promised ₹15,000 per month and claims ₹1,000 was transferred from his phone against his will.
Shashank Singh denied all charges, saying the complainant admitted he could not cook and was found recording videos inside the house.
The case is registered under Sections 296(B), 115(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and remains under active police investigation.

Cricketer Shashank Singh on Tuesday flatly denied allegations of assaulting a man employed at his family's Bhopal residence, asserting that the complainant had misrepresented himself as a cook and suggesting that a deliberate attempt was being made to implicate his family. The denial came a day after Ratibad police registered a First Information Report (FIR) against him, his father, and retired Madhya Pradesh Special Director General of Police Shailesh Singh, and their driver.

Background: What the FIR Alleges

The complaint was filed by Vipendra Singh Tomar, a resident of Rewa district, who alleged that he joined the family's Neelbad residence on 25 June after being promised a monthly salary of ₹15,000 along with food and accommodation. Tomar alleged that following complaints about shortcomings in his work, his mobile phone was confiscated. He further claimed that on 28 June, Shailesh Singh, Shashank Singh, and their driver assaulted and abused him, forced him out of the house, and transferred ₹1,000 from his phone towards food and accommodation expenses. Based on his complaint, Ratibad police registered a case against the three accused under Sections 296(B), 115(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Shashank Singh's Version of Events

Breaking his silence on the controversy, Shashank Singh maintained that the complainant was never formally appointed as a cook because the man himself admitted he did not know how to cook when asked to prepare food.

'First of all, I want to clarify that he was not a cook. He came claiming that he was a cook, but when he was asked to prepare food, he admitted that he did not know how to cook. He himself later said that he didn't know cooking,' the cricketer said.

He further alleged that the man was photographing and recording videos inside the house — including of rooms and decorative items — which prompted the family to inspect his mobile phone. 'I suspected that this could later turn into a theft-related issue. We checked his mobile phone because it contained photos and videos from inside our house,' Shashank Singh said.

Denying Assault and Wrongful Confinement

Shashank Singh categorically denied allegations of physical violence or wrongful confinement, stating that the complainant left the residence with his mobile phone intact. 'The allegation that he was held hostage for three days is extremely serious. We belong to a reputed family, and we would never indulge in such acts. When he left, he took his phone with him. If he got into a fight or was assaulted outside, how can I be responsible for that?' he said. He acknowledged that his mother had scolded the complainant for recording videos inside the house but insisted no assault or abuse took place on the premises. He added that his family believed 'someone was orchestrating' the incident.

Police Confirm Investigation Under Way

Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police Anil Sharma confirmed that the case is currently under investigation. 'A complaint was filed by a cook, following which a case involving charges of assault has been registered. The entire matter is under investigation. A case of assault has been registered against three individuals,' Sharma said. Notably, this case draws attention given that one of the accused, Shailesh Singh, is a retired senior police officer of the state — a detail that critics argue adds a layer of institutional sensitivity to the probe. The investigation is expected to determine whether the complainant's account or the cricketer's version holds up against available evidence, including any digital records from the mobile phone in question.

Point of View

With no independent witnesses cited publicly so far. What makes it unusual is the identity of the second accused: a retired state police DGP, whose institutional connections could — fairly or not — raise questions about the integrity of a probe conducted by the very force he once led. Police have confirmed the investigation but offered no timeline or interim findings. The digital evidence on the complainant's mobile phone, if preserved, may be the most objective arbiter here. Until then, both the cricketer's reputation and the complainant's credibility hang on an investigation whose independence will itself be scrutinised.
NationPress
30 Jun 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Shashank Singh assault case about?
Cricketer Shashank Singh, his father retired DGP Shailesh Singh, and their driver have been named in an FIR filed by Vipendra Singh Tomar, who alleged he was assaulted, abused, and had his phone confiscated while working at their Bhopal residence. The case was registered by Ratibad police on 30 June under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
What does Shashank Singh say in his defence?
Shashank Singh denies all allegations, claiming the complainant misrepresented himself as a cook and was found recording videos and photographs inside the house. He says there was no physical assault on the premises and that the complainant left with his phone.
Who filed the FIR and what are the specific allegations?
Vipendra Singh Tomar, a resident of Rewa district, filed the complaint. He alleged he joined the family's Neelbad residence on 25 June for ₹15,000 per month, was subsequently assaulted on 28 June, had his phone seized, and had ₹1,000 transferred from it without consent.
What is the current status of the police investigation?
Additional DCP Anil Sharma has confirmed the case is under active investigation. No arrests have been reported as of 30 June, and no further details on the timeline of the probe have been made public.
Why is Shailesh Singh's involvement significant?
Shailesh Singh is a retired Madhya Pradesh Special Director General of Police, making him one of the most senior former officers named in the case. His inclusion has added institutional sensitivity to the probe, as critics argue it warrants independent oversight.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 9 months ago
  3. 9 months ago
  4. 1 year ago
  5. 1 year ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google