Ashish Shelar calls Rahul Gandhi's Elon Musk support 'act of dishonesty'

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Ashish Shelar calls Rahul Gandhi's Elon Musk support 'act of dishonesty'

Synopsis

Maharashtra Minister Ashish Shelar accused Rahul Gandhi of 'dishonesty' toward India for backing Elon Musk's remarks before the Centre concluded its Starlink security review — framing it as siding with American interests over Indian workers. He also branded Opposition protests the 'grammar of anarchy' and challenged a colleague's Emergency analogy.

Key Takeaways

Maharashtra Minister Ashish Shelar on 9 October 2026 accused Rahul Gandhi of 'dishonesty' for supporting Elon Musk amid Indo-US tech tensions.
Shelar said the US was imposing restrictions on Indian tech companies, making support for an American industrialist harmful to young Indians' employment prospects.
He confirmed that the Starlink security verification process was already underway and that an appropriate government decision was expected.
Shelar labelled Opposition protests against the SIR process the 'grammar of anarchy,' arguing the Lok Sabha was the correct forum for such concerns.
Abhijit Dipke's claim of an Emergency in India was dismissed by Shelar as a sign of poor civics knowledge.
Shelar also criticised the CJP protest as a political tactic aimed at outmanoeuvring the Congress.

Maharashtra Minister Ashish Shelar on Friday, 9 October 2026, sharply criticised Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, saying that defending American industrialist Elon Musk while simultaneously attacking the Indian government amounted to an 'act of dishonesty' toward India's administrative system. Shelar, who holds charge of Cultural Affairs, Electronics, Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Development in the Maharashtra government, made the remarks while speaking to reporters in Mumbai.

Shelar's Case Against Rahul Gandhi

Shelar argued that the United States was actively imposing restrictions on Indian technology companies, creating an adverse environment for young Indians employed in the sector. Against that backdrop, he contended, siding with an American industrialist was not merely a political difference of opinion but a betrayal of Indian workers' interests.

The minister said Gandhi had chosen to amplify reactions originating from the United States without waiting for the Central Government or the relevant authorities to arrive at a considered decision on the Starlink security verification process. According to Shelar, officials had already clarified that work on the security verification framework concerning Musk and Starlink was underway and that an appropriate decision would follow in due course.

Opposition Protests Tagged 'Grammar of Anarchy'

Shelar also turned his attention to the Opposition's ongoing demonstrations in Delhi against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process. He described the protests as questioning the country's institutions and called them the 'grammar of anarchy.' He maintained that Parliament's Lok Sabha offered a constitutionally recognised platform to raise every concern, and that Opposition leaders were bypassing it by choosing street protests over legislative debate.

Shelar Takes Aim at Emergency Remark

The minister also criticised Abhijit Dipke over a reported statement in which Dipke allegedly said that an Emergency had been imposed in the country. Shelar said Dipke's grasp of civics appeared weak. 'If Abhijit Dipke believes that an Emergency has been imposed in the country, he clearly does not understand what an Emergency means,' Shelar said. He challenged Dipke to ask the Indian National Congress (Congress) what the Emergency period actually entailed — specifically whether citizens were free to speak and write during that time.

CJP Protest Criticised

Shelar also took a swipe at the CJP protest, describing it as a tactical manoeuvre designed to outflank the Congress politically rather than a genuine expression of civic concern. He did not elaborate on the specifics of the protest but framed it as an opportunistic political gambit.

Background and What to Watch

The remarks come amid a broader political flashpoint over the Indian government's security vetting process for Starlink's entry into the domestic market. The Centre has maintained that the verification framework is procedural, while Opposition figures have used Musk's public statements as a lever to question government intent. With Parliament's next session on the horizon, pressure is likely to build on both sides to bring the debate into the legislative arena.

Point of View

Anti-India' label on Rahul Gandhi ahead of whatever legislative session follows. The dishonesty charge is potent if it sticks — tech employment is an emotive issue in Maharashtra's IT belt — but it sidesteps the substantive question of whether the government's Starlink scrutiny timeline is transparent. Labelling every Opposition street protest the 'grammar of anarchy' is also a recurring Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) rhetorical move that risks appearing dismissive of legitimate dissent, especially when Parliament is not in session and the floor is simply unavailable. The Emergency jab at Dipke, while politically easy, distracts from the core Starlink debate.
NationPress
9 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Ashish Shelar call Rahul Gandhi's stance on Elon Musk 'dishonest'?
Shelar argued that Gandhi sided with reactions from the United States before the Indian government completed its security verification review of Elon Musk's Starlink. He said this amounted to prioritising an American industrialist's interests over those of young Indians working in the tech sector, which he termed dishonesty toward India's administrative system.
What is the Starlink security verification issue Shelar referred to?
Shelar confirmed that government officials were working on a security verification framework related to Elon Musk and Starlink's proposed entry into India. He said the Central Government or the relevant authorities would announce a decision once the review was complete.
What did Shelar mean by calling Opposition protests the 'grammar of anarchy'?
Shelar used the phrase to argue that Opposition demonstrations against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process undermined state institutions. He maintained that Parliament's Lok Sabha was the proper constitutional forum for raising such concerns rather than street protests.
Who is Abhijit Dipke, and why did Shelar criticise him?
Abhijit Dipke reportedly claimed that an Emergency had been imposed in India. Shelar dismissed the remark, saying Dipke lacked a basic understanding of what the Emergency — historically declared during the Congress government of 1975–77 — actually entailed, including restrictions on speech and the press.
What did Shelar say about the CJP protest?
Shelar described the CJP protest as a political manoeuvre designed to outflank the Congress rather than a genuine civic exercise. He did not elaborate on the specific protest but suggested its motivation was opportunistic.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 hours ago
  2. Yesterday
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 4 months ago
  7. 10 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google