Who are the six accused in the J&K CAT record tampering case?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The J&K Economic Offences Wing has charged six individuals with tampering records in a significant CAT case. With serious implications for the Horticulture Department, these allegations and the ongoing investigation raise critical questions about integrity in public service.
Key Takeaways
- Charge sheet filed against six individuals for tampering records.
- Allegations involve unauthorized alterations in official documents.
- Investigation uncovered multiple official seals and communications.
- Pathan Majid Ahmad Khan identified as the prime accused.
- Impact on public trust in administrative integrity.
Srinagar, Nov 19 (NationPress) The Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of the J&K Crime Branch announced on Wednesday that it has filed a charge sheet against six individuals implicated in the significant CAT record tampering case at the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Srinagar.
According to a statement, the EOW of the Crime Branch Kashmir has submitted a charge sheet in FIR No. 87/2022, citing violations under Sections 209, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code before the Hon’ble Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Srinagar.
The charge sheet involves the following accused individuals: Pathan Majid Ahmad Khan, son of Mohammad Dilawar Khan, a resident of Takia Khan, Sopore; Mushtaq Ahmad Rather, son of Ghulam Mohammad Rather, a resident of Ali Bagh Hygam; Mudasir Yousuf Wani, son of Mohammad Yousuf Wani, a resident of Tujjar Sharief, Sopore; Ghulam Mohammad Reshi, son of Ghulam Ahmad Reshi, a resident of Yamberzal Wani (Harda-Shiva), Sopore; Bashir Ahmad Dar, son of Ghulam Mohammad Dar, a resident of Bonpora, Nowpora Sopore; and Anoop Mishra, son of Santosh Kumar Mishra, a resident of Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh.
The case arose from a report indicating potential tampering of official documents submitted to the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in TA No. 4100/2021 by the office of the Chief Horticulture Officer. This led to the registration of a formal case and the initiation of an investigation. It was found that the records presented to the CAT in Srinagar had been unlawfully altered while in custody.
The primary accused, Pathan Majid Ahmad Khan, allegedly conspired with Anoop Mishra, a CAT employee, and other employees who benefitted from unauthorized changes in records related to their regularization in the Horticulture Department.
During the investigation, at least 12 official seals from various departments, including the Director of Horticulture and others, were seized from the residence of Pathan Majid Khan.
“Call Detail Records and WhatsApp communications confirmed the conspiracy and breach of trust by the CAT employee Anoop Mishra, as evident from the seized mobile phone of Pathan Majid Khan. Consequently, the charge sheet has been presented before the Hon'ble Court for judicial review,” the statement concluded.
Point of View
It is essential to uphold accountability and transparency. The actions of these individuals, if proven, threaten public trust and the efficacy of administrative processes. As always, we stand by the principles of justice and integrity in reporting these developments.
NationPress
19/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the CAT record tampering case about?
The CAT record tampering case involves allegations of unauthorized alterations to official documents submitted to the Central Administrative Tribunal, linked to the regularization of employees in the Horticulture Department.
Who are the accused individuals?
The accused include Pathan Majid Ahmad Khan, Mushtaq Ahmad Rather, Mudasir Yousuf Wani, Ghulam Mohammad Reshi, Bashir Ahmad Dar, and Anoop Mishra.
What actions have been taken by the Economic Offences Wing?
The Economic Offences Wing has filed a charge sheet against the accused individuals in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, detailing multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code.
What evidence was found during the investigation?
Investigators recovered 12 official seals from various departments and found corroborating evidence through Call Detail Records and WhatsApp communications.
What is the significance of this case?
This case highlights issues of corruption and integrity within public service, raising concerns about the management of official records.
