Will the Supreme Court Hear Delhi Police's Arguments on the Delhi Riots 'Larger Conspiracy' Case Tomorrow?

Click to start listening
Will the Supreme Court Hear Delhi Police's Arguments on the Delhi Riots 'Larger Conspiracy' Case Tomorrow?

Synopsis

As the Supreme Court gears up for another session on the contentious 'larger conspiracy' case related to the 2020 Delhi riots, key student leaders remain behind bars. This hearing could reshape the future for Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and others accused of orchestrating unrest. Stay tuned for updates on this critical legal battle.

Key Takeaways

  • Supreme Court to hear bail pleas of student leaders.
  • Activists remain detained under UAPA.
  • Delhi Police alleges premeditated conspiracy.
  • Claims aimed for international media attention.
  • Previous bail pleas were denied by the Delhi High Court.

New Delhi, Nov 17 (NationPress) The Supreme Court is set to continue hearing on Tuesday the bail applications of student leaders Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Gulfisha Fatima, and several other activists implicated in the alleged "larger conspiracy" surrounding the 2020 North East Delhi riots.

They remain incarcerated under the strict Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

According to the cause list released on the apex court's website, a Bench comprising Justices Aravind Kumar and N.V. Anjaria will deliberate on the arguments of the law officers representing the Delhi Police on November 18.

In opposition to the bail requests from Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, the Delhi Police filed a comprehensive counter-affidavit with the Supreme Court, asserting that both student activists had premeditated and systematically orchestrated the conspiracy behind the 2020 Delhi riots.

The affidavit detailed various chats, witness testimonies, and call records that tied their actions from December 2019 onwards, depicting Umar Khalid as a "key conspirator" and a "mentor" to others, including Sharjeel Imam, for mobilizing students, establishing protest networks, and choosing demonstration locations that allegedly escalated into violence.

The Delhi Police contended that the conspiracy was deliberately planned to coincide with the official visit of US President Donald Trump to India.

"This was orchestrated to attract the attention of the 'international media' and to elevate the CAA issue to a global concern by portraying it as a pogrom against the Muslim community in India. The CAA was strategically selected to act as a 'radicalizing catalyst' disguised as a 'peaceful protest'," the affidavit stated.

It identified Sharjeel Imam as a "top conspirator under the guidance of Umar Khalid", alleging that he masterminded the initial phase of the Delhi riots between December 13 and December 20, 2019.

Previously, the Delhi High Court had rejected the bail requests from Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid, and several other individuals charged in the 2020 city riots "larger conspiracy" case.

Point of View

It is imperative to observe that this case highlights ongoing tensions in India regarding civil rights and state responses to dissent. The allegations against Khalid and Imam are serious, and the judicial process must be respected and followed diligently to uphold justice and democracy.
NationPress
17/11/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Delhi riots 'larger conspiracy' case?
The case involves accusations against several activists, including Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, who are alleged to have orchestrated a conspiracy behind the 2020 North East Delhi riots.
What charges are the accused facing?
The accused are charged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), which allows for stringent measures against alleged terrorism-related acts.
When will the Supreme Court hear the bail pleas?
The Supreme Court is scheduled to resume hearing the bail pleas on November 18.
What does the Delhi Police claim?
The Delhi Police claims that the accused had premeditated and coordinated the conspiracy to incite violence during the riots.
What was the motive behind the alleged conspiracy?
The alleged motive was to draw international media attention to the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) by portraying it as a violent act against the Muslim community.
Nation Press