Will the Supreme Court Uphold Justice for Sonam Wangchuk's Arrest?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Supreme Court to hear Sonam Wangchuk's petition today.
- Allegations of political motives behind his arrest.
- Legal arguments focus on fundamental rights violations.
- Ladakh administration defends actions amid claims of victimization.
- Ongoing investigations into financial irregularities at Wangchuk's educational institute.
New Delhi, Oct 6 (NationPress) The Supreme Court is poised to review a petition today regarding the detention of Sonam Wangchuk, a prominent climate activist and education reform advocate from Ladakh.
The legal challenge, presented by his spouse Geetanjali Angmo on October 2, demands his swift release, asserting that the arrest is driven by political motives and infringes upon his fundamental rights.
Wangchuk has been held in Jodhpur, Rajasthan, since his arrest on September 24, which followed a series of violent protests in Leh, Ladakh. The case is set to be examined by a panel including Justice Arvind Kumar and Justice N.V. Anjaria.
In a strong rebuttal, the Ladakh administration has defended its actions, releasing a statement earlier this week that rejects claims of victimization as “baseless.” They maintain that the arrest and subsequent measures were executed based on reliable information, documentation, and legal justification.
“There is no aspect of witch-hunting or diversionary tactics,” the administration emphasized, requesting that the judicial process be allowed to unfold without bias.
The statement further elaborated on ongoing inquiries into alleged financial discrepancies and violations of foreign currency regulations involving the Himalayan Institute of Alternatives, Ladakh (HIAL), which Wangchuk established. Authorities allege that HIAL has been granting degrees without proper recognition, putting students' futures at risk, and purportedly has not disclosed foreign funding in its financial reports.
Moreover, the FCRA (Foreign Contribution Regulation Act) registration of SECMOL, another organization linked to Wangchuk, has reportedly been revoked due to several violations.
In relation to Wangchuk’s recent hunger strike and public comments, the administration accused him of making inflammatory statements, referencing Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh, and allegedly inciting youth against peaceful methods. They also cited a video from June 2025 on his YouTube channel in which Wangchuk purportedly discussed a revolution akin to the “Arab Spring” and suggested self-immolation as a protest method.