Why Was a Survey Inspector Arrested in TN's Parandur Airport Bribery Case?
Synopsis
In a shocking development, a survey inspector was arrested for allegedly accepting a bribe tied to land acquisition for the Parandur Greenfield Airport in Tamil Nadu. This incident raises serious concerns about corruption in public service and the ongoing challenges farmers face during land acquisitions.
Key Takeaways
Survey inspector arrested for bribery in Tamil Nadu.
Bribe demand linked to Parandur airport land acquisition.
Farmer filed a complaint after refusing to pay .
Vigilance team conducted a successful trap operation .
Investigations are ongoing for similar corruption cases.
Chennai, Feb 11 (NationPress) A survey inspector from the Revenue Department in Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu was apprehended by the District Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) division for allegedly soliciting and accepting a bribe from a farmer concerning land acquisition for the envisioned Parandur Greenfield Airport project, as reported by an official on Wednesday.
The individual, Sundara Vadivelu, aged 50, residing in Tirukalimedu, was part of a team responsible for verifying land documents and processing compensation claims for property owners impacted by the airport initiative.
This ambitious airport project is set to span approximately 4,800 acres across 15 villages, including Parandur and Ekanapuram, where land acquisition activities are currently ongoing.
As per DVAC officials, the complainant, Ranjith Kumar, a farmer from Kullappan Street in the Kancheepuram district, voluntarily offered 64 cents of his land for the project and submitted a petition requesting compensation from the government.
During the document verification in Parandur ‘A’ Area 4, the survey inspector reportedly demanded Rs 1 lakh to expedite the file clearance and facilitate the compensation release.
Reluctant to comply with the bribe demand, the farmer approached the DVAC and filed a formal complaint with Deputy Superintendent of Police Kalaiselvan.
In response, vigilance officials instructed the farmer to agree to an initial payment of Rs 50,000 and assure the inspector that the remaining sum would be settled post the compensation process.
Following protocol, the vigilance team treated the currency notes with chemical powder and set up a trap.
At approximately 10 p.m. on Tuesday, as the farmer handed over Rs 50,000 to the inspector in the Chengazhu Neeroda area of Kancheepuram, officers monitoring the transaction intervened and apprehended the official red-handed.
The suspect was then taken to the DVAC office in the Velligate area for further questioning. A case has been filed against him under the Prevention of Corruption Act, and he has been placed in judicial custody.
Officials stated that further investigations are ongoing to ascertain if similar bribe demands have been made to other farmers whose properties are being acquired for the proposed airport project.
Point of View
We stand committed to reporting on corruption issues with integrity and transparency. The arrest of the survey inspector underscores the necessity for accountability within public service. We will continue to follow this case closely and advocate for fair treatment of farmers affected by land acquisitions.
NationPress
9 May 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the reason behind the survey inspector's arrest?
The survey inspector was arrested for allegedly demanding and accepting a bribe from a farmer related to land acquisition for the Parandur Greenfield Airport project.
What amount of bribe was reportedly demanded?
The survey inspector allegedly demanded Rs 1 lakh for clearing the file and facilitating compensation release.
Who filed the complaint against the inspector?
The complaint was filed by Ranjith Kumar, a farmer from Kullappan Street in Kancheepuram district.
What action did the vigilance team take?
The vigilance team set up a trap and apprehended the survey inspector when the farmer handed over Rs 50,000.
Is there an ongoing investigation regarding similar cases?
Yes, officials are investigating to determine if other farmers faced similar bribe demands during the land acquisition process.
