Is Tamil Nadu's BIM Failing to Reinstate a Dalit Teacher?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Dr. C.N.S. Ramnath Babu is fighting for his reinstatement after an unlawful termination.
- The Madras High Court ruled in his favor, yet compliance remains an issue.
- The case raises important questions about justice and dignity in education.
- Legal experts highlight the potential consequences for BIM if they do not comply.
- The Higher Education Minister has promised a thorough investigation.
Chennai, Sep 1 (NationPress) An assistant professor belonging to the Scheduled Caste community has approached the state higher education department, contending that the Bharathidasan Institute of Management (BIM) has not reinstated him, despite a favorable ruling from the Madras High Court.
Dr C.N.S. Ramnath Babu, a former student of BIM, commenced his role as an assistant professor in the marketing department in April 2021.
In July 2023, following the conclusion of his probationary period, he was dismissed by Director Asit K. Barma without prior notice.
Dr Babu contested this action by appealing to the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, which initially stayed and subsequently annulled the termination in November 2023. The conflict continued after BIM obtained a temporary stay.
Nonetheless, in August this year, a division bench rejected the appeal and reaffirmed the reinstatement order, stating that although probationers may be released due to inadequate performance, any punitive or stigmatic termination necessitates a formal inquiry.
On August 24, local police filed a case against Barma under the SC/ST Act.
“Since July 2023, I have been engaged in this struggle solely to demonstrate that I am a competent teacher and scholar. Each day is a battle to maintain my dignity without a source of income,” stated Dr Babu.
He further alleged that BIM has not adhered to reservation policies in faculty hiring, adding, “This is centered on justice and dignity. I merely seek what I rightfully deserve.”
When approached for comments, Barma indicated that the institution respects the court's decision but retains the option to appeal to the Supreme Court within a 90-day timeframe.
“Reservation policies do not pertain to our faculty hiring or promotions. We adhere to merit-based selection according to institutional guidelines. Simultaneously, we are considering legal options,” he remarked.
Legal analysts suggest that unless BIM obtains a stay from the Supreme Court, the High Court’s directive remains obligatory, and delays in compliance might provoke contempt actions.
The Higher Education Minister, Govi Chezhian, assured that the state would investigate the situation. “The department will review the case and undertake necessary actions,” he stated.