Did FM Sitharaman Overlook Economic Instability? Shiv Sena UBT Responds
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Mumbai, Feb 1 (NationPress) Aaditya Thackeray, leader of Shiv Sena Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray (UBT), sharply criticized the Finance Minister for not addressing the economic instability troubling everyday citizens.
He pointed out that despite Maharashtra being the largest contributor to the national treasury, the state was overlooked regarding critical infrastructure and financial resources.
Thackeray mentioned that the budget did not inspire confidence in the public concerning job creation or inflation control.
“Maharashtra, as the largest contributor to the Union government’s treasury, is hardly acknowledged. Whether it’s GDP, GST, or Income Tax, we contribute the most but receive the least. Regarding the Mumbai-Pune High-Speed Railway, what exactly does it entail? A bullet train? Vande Bharat? An upgrade for existing services? What’s the timeline? Is it fully funded by the GoI, or will Maharashtra contribute?” he questioned.
He added that if this were genuinely a budget for the entire nation, one of his persistent demands could have been recognized—a dedicated International Financial Services Centre for Mumbai and potentially for Bengaluru, Chennai, Kolkata, and Delhi.
“True growth would be national and organic, unlike the unsuccessful GIFT. However, considering factors beyond elections would be a significant boon for India,” he remarked.
Shiv Sena UBT MP Sanjay Raut stated that the budget fails to provide a roadmap for the middle class and those in poverty.
He emphasized the absence of substantial income tax relief for salaried individuals, particularly when taxpayers were hopeful for alterations in standard deductions or tax brackets.
“The stock market's negative response during the speech is evidence that the Viksit Bharat 2047 vision lacks immediate relevance,” he observed.
MP Priyanka Chaturvedi drew attention on social media for “predicting” the Finance Minister's outfit (a Kanjeevaram silk saree from Tamil Nadu) as indicative of the government's focus on states heading into elections.
She argued that the budget prioritized political optics for states like Tamil Nadu and West Bengal over the nation's economic well-being.
She characterized the budget as a significant letdown that failed to meet expectations amid a climate of global economic uncertainty.