Was Article 370 a Necessary Step, Yet Statehood Still Overdue?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Aditya Thackeray highlights the necessity of abolishing Article 370 while expressing concern over the unfulfilled promise of restoring statehood to Jammu and Kashmir. His remarks come amid rising tensions and global trade issues that impact India.
Key Takeaways
- Article 370's removal was vital for Indian governance.
- Statehood for Jammu and Kashmir remains unfulfilled.
- Security concerns persist in the region.
- International trade issues are impacting India’s global standing.
- Political relationships may affect domestic policies.
Mumbai, Aug 5 (NationPress) As India marks the sixth anniversary of the revocation of Article 370 and the division of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories, Shiv Sena-UBT leader and MLA Aditya Thackeray expressed that while the abolition of this constitutional clause was an essential and commendable action, the anticipated restoration of statehood continues to be unmet.
"The removal of Article 370 was essential, and we take pride in this action. However, the statehood that was supposed to follow has yet to be realized. The prevailing security scenario remains alarming—there is still no clear indication regarding the culprits behind the recent terrorist incidents in Pahalgam," stated Thackeray, who is the son of SS-UBT chief Uddhav Thackeray.
Thackeray's comments emerged as political figures from various parties assessed the ramifications of the decision made in 2019, which drastically changed the constitutional and administrative framework of Jammu and Kashmir.
In response to US President Donald Trump's recent remarks about imposing "significantly higher tariffs" on India due to its ongoing oil trade with Russia, Thackeray conveyed unease regarding the Indian government's lack of response.
"It is of utmost importance that no Union Minister has addressed this issue thus far. India seems to be in a vulnerable position globally. We must respond decisively. The Commerce Ministry needs to issue a public statement as this matter directly affects trade and consequently impacts everyday citizens," he added.
Mocking the camaraderie between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump, he remarked: "Trump and PM Modi were once celebrated as best friends, but that so-called friendship appears to have vanished."
Reflecting on the fifth anniversary of the Ram Mandir Bhoomi Pujan, Thackeray commented, “Notable saints like Shankaracharya were excluded from the inauguration. The temple was not fully completed at that time—it became more of a political issue rather than a religious milestone. We had previously stated—for them, it's 'First temple, then government.'"
Point of View
It is clear that while the abrogation of Article 370 was a significant constitutional move, the lack of subsequent statehood restoration raises questions about governance and accountability. As the nation reflects on these developments, it is vital to prioritize the voices of the citizens affected by these changes.
NationPress
09/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Article 370?
Article 370 was a provision in the Indian Constitution that granted special autonomy to the region of Jammu and Kashmir.
What happened on the sixth anniversary of Article 370's abrogation?
Aditya Thackeray emphasized the need for statehood restoration while celebrating the removal of Article 370.
Why is statehood for Jammu and Kashmir important?
Statehood is crucial for ensuring local governance and representation for the people of Jammu and Kashmir.
What concerns did Thackeray raise about security?
Thackeray pointed out ongoing security threats, particularly regarding recent terrorist activities.
How has the international community reacted to India's trade with Russia?
Thackeray expressed concern over the Indian government’s lack of response to international pressures regarding trade.
