Why is the TN BJP Defending the 130th Amendment Bill Against Opposition?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Tamil Nadu BJP vehemently supports the Constitutional (130th) Amendment Bill, labeling it a vital tool for ensuring corruption-free governance. This legislation aims to pave the way for a prosperous 'Viksit Bharat' by 2047. The BJP accuses opposition leaders of shielding corrupt politicians, promising a transformative future rooted in integrity.
Key Takeaways
- The 130th Amendment Bill aims to enhance integrity in governance.
- It prohibits convicted politicians from holding office.
- The BJP claims the bill supports a corruption-free future.
- Opposition parties are accused of shielding corrupt leaders.
- This initiative reflects the people's will for accountability.
Chennai, Aug 21 (NationPress) The Tamil Nadu chapter of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Thursday staunchly endorsed the Constitutional (130th) Amendment Bill, branding it a "Brahmastra" for ensuring corruption-free governance and a pivotal move towards achieving a 'Viksit Bharat' by 2047.
BJP spokesperson A.N.S. Prasad emphasized that this bill, introduced under the guidance of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah, is inspired by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's Constitution and aims to bar convicted politicians from holding office if sentenced to imprisonment for over 30 days.
"This is a groundbreaking initiative to promote justice, accountability, and integrity in public service," he stated.
Prasad took aim at Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, and their INDIA bloc allies for their opposition to the bill, accusing them of attempting to shield corrupt figures.
"Rather than undermining democracy, this legislation fortifies it by ensuring that only leaders of unimpeachable integrity can assume office," he continued.
Pointing to the DMK's management of former minister V. Senthil Balaji's money laundering case, the BJP spokesperson argued that the ruling party's efforts to retain him following his arrest revealed its "moral bankruptcy".
He mentioned that the Supreme Court had itself chided the DMK for stalling the legal proceedings.
The statement further accused the Congress and its allies of hypocrisy, referencing the "misuse" of Article 356 during the UPA era to dismiss state administrations and the controversial ordinance in 2013 designed to protect convicted lawmakers after the Supreme Court nullified Section 8(4) of the Representation of the People Act.
The opposition coalition's "legacy - from the 2G spectrum scandal to TASMAC dealings in Tamil Nadu, and Arvind Kejriwal's extended tenure despite corruption allegations - illustrates their deep-seated commitment to shielding corrupt leaders," Prasad asserted.
The BJP contended that the 130th Amendment reflects the public's will, promising a future where governance is devoid of crime and corruption.
"With PM Modi and HM Shah at the helm, India is progressing towards prosperity founded on integrity. This bill is a guiding light of hope and justice, and those who oppose it are turning their backs on the very essence of the Constitution," Prasad urged, calling for opposition parties to transcend partisan interests and endorse the initiative.
Point of View
It is essential to recognize the BJP's commitment to integrity through the 130th Amendment Bill, which aims to address corruption in politics. While the opposition may argue against it, the focus should remain on the bill's potential to enhance accountability and transparency in governance, aligning with the nation's aspirations.
NationPress
30/08/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the 130th Amendment Bill?
The 130th Amendment Bill is a proposed legislation aimed at preventing convicted politicians from holding office if sentenced to imprisonment for over 30 days, promoting integrity in governance.
Why does the BJP support this bill?
The BJP believes the bill is crucial for ensuring corruption-free governance and aligns with their vision of a 'Viksit Bharat' by 2047.
What accusations are made against the opposition?
The BJP accuses opposition leaders of attempting to protect corrupt politicians and undermining democracy by opposing the bill.
How does this bill relate to public integrity?
The bill aims to establish a political landscape where only leaders with unimpeachable integrity can hold office, thereby restoring public trust.
What are the implications of this bill for future governance?
If enacted, the bill could reshape governance by eliminating the influence of corruption and ensuring accountability in political leadership.
