Mamallan reservoir in Chengalpattu built 30% without fisheries NOC
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
A significant inter-departmental dispute has surfaced in Tamil Nadu over the Mamallan reservoir project in Chengalpattu, after the Water Resources Department (WRD) allowed construction to advance to nearly 30 per cent completion without securing a mandatory No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Fisheries Department. The project, designed to augment Chennai's drinking water supply, now faces regulatory uncertainty with the clearance still pending.
Project Background and Scale
The reservoir is being developed in the Kovalam sub-basin, situated between the East Coast Road and Old Mahabalipuram Road, spanning approximately 5,161 acres. It is designed to hold an annual storage capacity of 2.25 thousand million cubic feet of water. Former Chief Minister M.K. Stalin laid the foundation stone in January, marking the project's formal launch.
The NOC Gap: Six Months of Unchecked Construction
Construction reportedly continued for nearly six months after the foundation stone was laid before the WRD formally approached the Additional Director of Fisheries and Fishermen Welfare on 21 July to seek the NOC. The timing has raised concerns within the government, given the project's coastal proximity and its potential impact on the livelihoods of around 5,000 fishing families.
A senior government official said the WRD should have obtained the Fisheries Department's approval before breaking ground. 'When a major project is located close to the coast and has implications for fishermen's livelihoods, prior approval and a proper NOC are essential. Allowing construction to begin without obtaining the necessary clearance was a mistake,' the official said. The official also questioned why the WRD waited until July to file its request when a substantial portion of the work was already done.
Fisheries Department Seeks More Information
According to the Fisheries Department, further details are required to assess the reservoir's likely environmental and livelihood implications. Officials indicated that repeated requests for information have not yet received a satisfactory response from the WRD. The department has stated it will decide on the clearance — and any conditions to be imposed — only after the required documents are examined.
What Happens Next
With construction continuing while the NOC remains pending, uncertainty persists over whether the WRD may be required to modify the project design or introduce safeguards for affected fishing communities. This comes amid broader scrutiny of inter-departmental coordination in major infrastructure projects across the state. The outcome of the clearance process could set a precedent for how Tamil Nadu manages large-scale projects near ecologically sensitive and livelihood-critical coastal zones.