UP supplementary budget ₹59,019 crore tabled amid SP protest over Ram Temple theft row
Synopsis
The Uttar Pradesh Assembly's first supplementary budget of ₹59,019.54 crore was tabled on 5 August — but the numbers barely registered. SP legislators stormed the Well over the Ram Temple donation theft row, got their MLA suspended, and forced the real political story of the session into the open: the Yogi government's refusal to debate an allegation that strikes at the heart of its core ideological identity.
Key Takeaways
Uttar Pradesh government tabled a ₹59,019.54 crore supplementary budget for 2026-27 on 5 August .
SP MLA Sachin Yadav was suspended by Assembly Speaker Satish Mahana for displaying protest posters during the session.
Heavy and Medium Industries Department received the highest allocation of ₹22,107.88 crore ; Rural Development got ₹17,942.73 crore .
SP legislators demanded a discussion on the alleged Ram Temple donation theft before the budget debate — a demand the government resisted.
Marshals and women marshals were deployed inside the Assembly as tensions escalated.
Budget discussion is expected to resume on Wednesday .
The Uttar Pradesh Assembly descended into turmoil on Tuesday, 5 August as Samajwadi Party (SP) legislators disrupted proceedings over the alleged Ram Temple donation theft controversy, overshadowing the state government's presentation of its first supplementary budget of ₹59,019.54 crore for the financial year 2026-27. The Yogi Adityanath-led government tabled the financial proposals amid continuous sloganeering and protests from the Opposition benches.
How the disruption unfolded
SP legislators entered the Well of the Assembly during Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath's address, demanding that the alleged Ram Temple offering theft issue be taken up for discussion before the budget debate commenced. SP MLA Sachin Yadav displayed a poster featuring the Chief Minister's photograph alongside protest slogans, prompting Assembly Speaker Satish Mahana to first issue a warning and subsequently suspend Yadav from the House after he persisted with the demonstration.
As the situation escalated, marshals were deployed inside the Assembly. SP women legislators formed a ring around Yadav during the protest, following which women marshals were also called in to restore order. Tensions eased only after Adityanath, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Suresh Khanna, and Deputy Chief Minister Brajesh Pathak exited the chamber.
SP MLA suspended, stages sit-in outside
Following his suspension, Sachin Yadav staged a sit-in protest outside the Assembly premises near the statue of former Prime Minister Chaudhary Charan Singh. SP legislators accused the government of deliberately sidestepping a discussion on the Ram Temple donation controversy. The exchange of slogans between the ruling party and Opposition members created a charged atmosphere throughout the session.
Key allocations in the supplementary budget
Despite the disruptions, details of the supplementary budget were placed on record. The Heavy and Medium Industries Department received the highest allocation at ₹22,107.88 crore, while the Rural Development Department was allocated ₹17,942.73 crore. The supplementary budget is designed to meet additional financial requirements of various departments and support ongoing development projects across Uttar Pradesh.
What happens next
The Assembly is scheduled to resume on Wednesday, with the supplementary budget discussion expected to proceed. However, the Ram Temple donation theft row shows no sign of losing political heat, and further clashes between the treasury benches and the Opposition are anticipated as the session continues. Whether the government agrees to a dedicated discussion on the controversy remains the central question heading into the next sitting.
Point of View
The Opposition has ensured that the Yogi government's supplementary budget — ordinarily a routine financial exercise — is now inseparable from a reputationally damaging allegation. The BJP's silence on a debate is itself a political signal; a party that built its electoral identity on Ram Temple cannot easily dismiss the controversy without appearing defensive. The suspension of Sachin Yadav hands the SP a ready-made martyr narrative heading into the next news cycle. The real test is whether the government eventually concedes a structured discussion, or allows the controversy to fester through the remainder of the session.
NationPress
5 Aug 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the UP supplementary budget 2026-27?
The Uttar Pradesh government's first supplementary budget for 2026-27, worth ₹59,019.54 crore, was presented in the state Assembly on 5 August to meet additional financial requirements of various departments. The Heavy and Medium Industries Department received the largest share at ₹22,107.88 crore, followed by Rural Development at ₹17,942.73 crore.
Why did SP legislators disrupt the UP Assembly session?
Samajwadi Party legislators demanded that the alleged Ram Temple donation theft issue be discussed before the supplementary budget debate began. When the government did not concede, SP MLAs entered the Well of the Assembly, raised slogans, and displayed protest posters, leading to a prolonged disruption.
Why was SP MLA Sachin Yadav suspended?
Assembly Speaker Satish Mahana suspended SP MLA Sachin Yadav after he displayed a poster featuring Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath's photograph alongside protest slogans and continued with the demonstration despite an initial warning to desist.
What is the Ram Temple donation theft controversy?
The alleged Ram Temple donation theft issue refers to a controversy over offerings made at the Ram Temple in Ayodhya, which the Opposition — particularly the SP — has raised as a matter requiring legislative scrutiny. The government has not agreed to a formal debate on the issue during the current session.
When will the UP supplementary budget discussion take place?
The Assembly is expected to take up discussion on the supplementary budget on Wednesday, 6 August, when proceedings resume. Further clashes between the ruling party and Opposition over the Ram Temple controversy are anticipated.
