Have UP District Officials Rebutted Akhilesh Yadav’s Claims on Voter Deletions?

Click to start listening
Have UP District Officials Rebutted Akhilesh Yadav’s Claims on Voter Deletions?

Synopsis

The recent accusations by Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav against the Election Commission regarding voter deletions have been met with firm rebuttals from district officials in Uttar Pradesh. This conflict underscores the significance of voter list management as the elections draw near, raising questions about transparency and accountability.

Key Takeaways

  • Akhilesh Yadav claims the Election Commission mishandled voter affidavits.
  • District officials in Uttar Pradesh rejected the accusations.
  • Clarifications were made regarding allegations of wrongful voter deletions.
  • The political row highlights concerns over the integrity of voter list management.
  • Potential implications for transparency in upcoming elections.

New Delhi, Aug 19 (NationPress) Following the allegations made by Samajwadi Party (SP) leader Akhilesh Yadav regarding the Election Commission's mishandling of voter affidavits, district magistrates in Uttar Pradesh have responded by rejecting his claims. On August 17, Yadav took to X, asserting that the Election Commission (EC) denied receiving affidavits submitted by the SP concerning wrongful deletions of voters' names.

Yadav stated, "The EC should verify the receipts from their office as evidence of our affidavit submissions. We call for the Election Commission to provide an affidavit confirming the authenticity of the digital receipts we received; otherwise, both the Election Commission and Digital India will be under scrutiny. If the BJP departs, truth will reign supreme," he remarked.

In response, the Barabanki District Magistrate clarified on August 19 that they had reviewed two affidavits regarding alleged wrongful deletions in Assembly constituency 266-Kursi.

"Two voters from the 266-Kursi Assembly constituency in Barabanki filed affidavits about their names being wrongly removed from the voter list. Upon investigation, it was confirmed that both voters are indeed listed on the voter rolls," stated the Barabanki DM on X.

Similarly, the Jaunpur DM addressed concerns regarding five voters in Assembly constituency 366-Jaunpur, whose names were reportedly deleted incorrectly.

"An email complaint was received concerning the erroneous removal of five voters' names in the Jaunpur Assembly Constituency 366. All five individuals had passed away prior to 2022. This was verified by their families, local residents, and the local councillor. The names of these deceased individuals were removed following the rules, making the complaint entirely unfounded and misleading," the Jaunpur DM stated on X.

In Kasganj, affidavits concerning eight voters from Assembly constituency 101-Amampur were reviewed. The district authorities determined that seven of the names were duplicates.

"A complaint was filed via email regarding the incorrect removal of eight voters' names in the 101 Amanpur Assembly Constituency of Kasganj District. The investigation revealed that seven names were listed twice, and one name was removed as per regulations," the Kasganj DM explained on X.

He added, "The names of these seven voters remain on the voter list today. Following the death of one voter, their spouse submitted Form 7, leading to the removal of the deceased's name."

These clarifications emphasize the Election Commission's stance that deletions are conducted strictly according to protocol.

Nonetheless, this political dispute indicates that voter list management may become a contentious issue as elections approach, with opposition parties likely to question the EC’s transparency.

Point of View

It is crucial to maintain an objective perspective as we witness the ongoing dispute between political parties and electoral authorities. The accusations from Akhilesh Yadav highlight concerns over electoral integrity, while the responses from district officials aim to reassure the public about the procedural correctness of voter list management. It is evident that the upcoming elections will bring heightened scrutiny of the Election Commission's practices.
NationPress
19/08/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What were Akhilesh Yadav's allegations against the Election Commission?
Akhilesh Yadav accused the Election Commission of mishandling voter affidavits and raised questions about the credibility of 'Digital India'.
How did UP district officials respond to Yadav's claims?
District magistrates in UP issued clarifications rejecting Yadav's allegations, confirming that proper procedures were followed regarding voter deletions.
What did the Barabanki District Magistrate state?
The Barabanki DM confirmed that two affidavits regarding wrongful deletions were examined, finding that the voters' names were correctly registered.
Were any of the voters mentioned in the complaints deceased?
Yes, the Jaunpur DM indicated that all five voters in one complaint had passed away before 2022, leading to their names being removed according to rules.
What implications might this political dispute have?
The ongoing dispute could lead to increased scrutiny and challenges regarding the transparency of the Election Commission as elections approach.