Ex-Tencent Hunyuan lead: China behind in LLM race but can still win at AI

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Ex-Tencent Hunyuan lead: China behind in LLM race but can still win at AI

Synopsis

Ex-Tencent Hunyuan chief Liu Wei says China's AI firms are 'copying DeepSeek or US companies' at the core LLM level and lack the paradigm-defining breakthroughs — like ChatGPT or Claude Code — needed to lead. He left one of China's best-funded AI teams in late 2024, and his verdict is the bluntest yet from an insider.

Key Takeaways

Liu Wei , former head of Tencent Holdings ' Hunyuan team, left the company in late 2024 after more than eight years .
Liu says Chinese AI firms lack fanshi (paradigm) innovations, citing OpenAI 's ChatGPT and Anthropic 's Claude Code as benchmarks China has not matched. 'Chinese companies are either copying DeepSeek or US companies at the core technical level,' Liu Wei said.
Public benchmark score improvements do not accurately reflect the real-world capability gap between Chinese and US LLMs, according to Liu .
DeepSeek 's latest V4 model reportedly failed to reach the heights of its earlier releases, while Anthropic launched its Mythos model in April .
Despite the LLM gap, Liu argues China can still win in AI through alternative strategic approaches beyond frontier model development.

Liu Wei, former head of Tencent Holdings' Hunyuan foundational model team, says China is falling behind in the global large language model race — but argues the country can still carve out a winning position in AI through a different strategic path. Speaking publicly for the first time since his departure from Tencent in late 2024, Liu offered a candid assessment of where Chinese AI stands and where it must go.

The Paradigm Problem

Liu Wei, who spent more than eight years at the Shenzhen-based tech giant before quietly exiting, said the central weakness of China's AI industry is a lack of fanshi — a Chinese term for 'paradigm' widely used among AI researchers to describe a breakthrough that defines a new era of innovation. Notable examples of such paradigm shifts, he noted, include OpenAI's ChatGPT and Anthropic's Claude Code. 'Chinese companies are either copying DeepSeek or US companies at the core technical level,' he said, referring specifically to large language model development.

Benchmark Scores vs Real-World Performance

There has been recurring speculation since DeepSeek's breakout moment in early 2025 about whether Chinese LLMs have genuinely closed the gap with their US counterparts. Liu cautioned that narrowing scores on public benchmarks do not accurately reflect the gap in real-world usefulness — a distinction that matters significantly for enterprise and consumer adoption. The divergence between benchmark performance and practical capability remains one of the most debated fault lines in global AI evaluation.

Why It Matters

The timing of Liu's departure raised immediate questions: Hunyuan had been introduced only a year before he left, and Tencent remains one of China's most heavily capitalised technology companies. His exit suggested internal friction over strategic direction at a critical juncture in the AI arms race. His assessment now lends weight to concerns that China's LLM ecosystem is increasingly derivative rather than generative at the frontier level.

The Competitive Backdrop

US industry leaders have continued pushing the technical frontier, most notably with the launch of Anthropic's Mythos model in April. Meanwhile, domestic Chinese leader DeepSeek reportedly failed to match the heights of its earlier breakthroughs with its latest V4 model, according to industry observers. Other major Chinese tech players — including ByteDance, Kuaishou, and Meta Platforms' China-facing operations — continue to invest heavily in LLM development, but the paradigm gap Liu describes remains unaddressed.

What's Next

Despite his pessimism on LLMs, Liu Wei maintains that China retains a viable path to winning in AI more broadly — likely through application-layer innovation, vertical deployment, and markets where access to frontier US models is restricted. The question of whether any Chinese lab can produce a genuine paradigm-defining breakthrough, rather than an optimisation of existing architectures, will define the next phase of the global AI competition. Observers will be watching DeepSeek's next model release and Tencent Hunyuan's roadmap for early signals.

Point of View

And insiders have known it. The benchmark-versus-real-world-usefulness distinction he raises is precisely the gap that matters for enterprise contracts, sovereign AI deployments, and export competitiveness — not headline leaderboard positions. What mainstream coverage misses is that China's LLM optimisation strategy works domestically but leaves it structurally dependent on architectural ideas originating in the US, a vulnerability that compounds with every new chip-access restriction. The more consequential question is whether China's application-layer strengths — in robotics, industrial AI, and consumer super-apps — can compensate for a widening frontier model deficit as the US pulls further ahead with models like Anthropic's Mythos.
NationPress
6 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Liu Wei leave Tencent's Hunyuan AI team?
Liu Wei departed Tencent Holdings ' Hunyuan foundational model team in late 2024 after more than eight years at the company. He has since indicated that frustration with the lack of genuine paradigm-level innovation in China's AI industry was a central concern, though no single official reason for his exit was stated.
Is China's AI behind the US in 2026?
According to Liu Wei , China is behind in the large language model race because domestic firms are 'copying DeepSeek or US companies at the core technical level' rather than producing paradigm-defining breakthroughs. He also cautioned that narrowing public benchmark scores overstate how close Chinese LLMs are to US models in real-world usefulness.
What is fanshi and why does it matter for AI?
Fanshi is a Chinese term for 'paradigm,' widely used among AI researchers to describe a breakthrough that sets the direction for a new era of innovation. Liu Wei cited OpenAI 's ChatGPT and Anthropic 's Claude Code as examples of fanshi moments — and argued that China has yet to produce an equivalent.
How did DeepSeek's V4 model perform compared to earlier versions?
DeepSeek 's latest V4 model reportedly failed to reach the same heights as the company's earlier releases, according to industry observers. This came as Anthropic launched its Mythos model in April , continuing the US push at the technical frontier.
Can China still win in AI despite being behind in the LLM race?
Liu Wei believes China retains a viable path to winning in AI more broadly, even if it is behind in the large language model competition. The likely route involves application-layer innovation, vertical industry deployment, and markets where access to frontier US models is restricted or unavailable.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 6 days ago
  2. 1 week ago
  3. 1 week ago
  4. 2 weeks ago
  5. 2 weeks ago
  6. 1 month ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 1 month ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google