Did Ex-England Cricketer David Lloyd Accuse Pant of 'Milking' His Injury?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a surprising revelation, former England cricketer David Lloyd claims the legends at Old Trafford believe Rishabh Pant was overstating his injury during the fourth Test. Discover the implications of this accusation and the ongoing debate surrounding injury substitutes in cricket.
Key Takeaways
- David Lloyd accused Rishabh Pant of 'milking' his injury.
- Pant sustained a foot injury while batting during the fourth Test.
- The discussion on injury substitutes in cricket is ongoing.
- Lloyd is in favor of allowing substitutes for serious injuries.
- Pant's return was met with applause from the crowd.
New Delhi, July 25 (NationPress) Former England cricketer David Lloyd shared that the prevalent opinion in the ‘legends lounge’ at Old Trafford was that Indian wicketkeeper Rishabh Pant was ‘milking his injury’ when he came out to bat on Day 2 of the fourth Test.
Pant was at 37 runs on Day 1 when he sustained an injury while trying to reverse sweep a yorker from Chris Woakes, which struck his toe and reportedly caused a fracture to his right foot. Regardless of the injury, he resumed batting after the dismissal of Shardul Thakur and was met with resounding applause in Manchester. However, Lloyd contended that Pant should have been timed out.
"I’ve never experienced a metatarsal, which I believe is located in the foot. I have, however, endured a smashed hand against Andy Roberts and a fractured cheekbone. I was unable to bat after either injury, although I did continue with a broken finger. Pant appeared to be in agony; it was quite heroic of him to emerge, nonetheless.
“I was present in that legends lounge today, and the consensus was, 'He is milking that injury. It can't be that severe. He has exaggerated it, coming down those steps, and one or two suggested, 'He should be timed out,'" stated former English cricketer David Lloyd on talkSPORT Cricket.
Pant’s injury reignited the discussion on whether substitutes should be permitted for injuries in Test cricket. The England legend supported this concept in cases of external injuries like Pant’s.
“While I am generally against the use of runners, I favor substitutes for external injuries. It does raise numerous issues, but if it is an external injury, such as a break, and medically he won't be fit for six weeks, a like-for-like substitute could be introduced. This is an important consideration, but it shouldn't be about replacing a batter with a spinner,” he remarked.
Point of View
I believe David Lloyd's comments reflect a broader concern in cricket regarding player injuries and the integrity of the game. While opinions may vary, it is crucial to maintain a fair discussion about injuries and the potential for substitutes, ensuring that the game remains competitive and authentic.
NationPress
26/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did David Lloyd say about Rishabh Pant's injury?
David Lloyd suggested that Rishabh Pant was 'milking' his injury, implying that he exaggerated its severity while batting during the fourth Test.
What was the nature of Rishabh Pant's injury?
Rishabh Pant sustained an injury to his right foot, reportedly a fracture, after being struck by a yorker from Chris Woakes.
What is the debate surrounding injury substitutes in cricket?
The debate centers around whether players should be allowed substitutes for external injuries, which some believe could enhance the fairness of the game.
What are David Lloyd's views on injury substitutes?
Lloyd supports the idea of substitutes for external injuries, emphasizing that if a player is medically unfit for an extended period, a like-for-like replacement should be allowed.
How did the crowd react to Pant's return to bat?
Rishabh Pant received a thunderous applause from the crowd in Manchester upon his return to bat after his injury.
