Does Women's Tennis Really Need the ‘Battle of Sexes’?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Iga Swiatek, a six-time Grand Slam winner, critiques the 'Battle of the Sexes' as only a partial representation of women’s tennis. She emphasizes the sport’s evolution and asserts that comparisons to men's tennis are unnecessary, highlighting modern events like the United Cup as the true celebration of female athletes.
Key Takeaways
- Iga Swiatek emphasizes that women's tennis does not need to be compared to men's.
- The 'Battle of the Sexes' is viewed as an outdated representation of the sport.
- Modern events like the United Cup offer a more accurate reflection of the current tennis landscape.
- Women’s tennis is now recognized as a global professional sport.
- Swiatek encourages celebration of female athletes on their own terms.
Sydney, Jan 3 (NationPress) Six-time Grand Slam champion Iga Swiatek has downplayed the importance of the “Battle of the Sexes” event, which gained significant attention during the 1973 tour, claiming it only captured a fraction of the overall women's tennis landscape.
Swiatek emphasized that while many regard it as a hallmark event in tennis history, women in tennis have established their own identity and should not be compared to men’s tennis.
“I haven’t watched because I don’t engage with such events,” Swiatek stated during a press conference. “It certainly garnered a lot of interest. It was entertaining, but I wouldn't say it contributed to social change or addressed any significant issues.”
Currently ranked No. 2 in the world and competing in the United Cup in Sydney this week, Swiatek believes that the mixed team event is a much more meaningful celebration of women's tennis. The match between Aryna Sabalenka, the world No. 1 in women's singles, and Australian entertainer Nick Kyrgios has drawn parallels to the famous 1973 clash between Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs.
Kyrgios triumphed over Sabalenka with a score of 6-3, 6-3, cleverly minimizing his side of the court by nine percent to neutralize Sabalenka's advantages in strength and speed; however, Swiatek felt no valid comparison could be made. She noted that the context that made the 1973 match iconic is now outdated, asserting that women's tennis has evolved into a legitimate global professional sport.
“I think the name was merely a homage to the Billie Jean King match in ’73. That’s all,” she remarked. “There are no further similarities since I believe women’s tennis currently stands on its own merits. We have numerous outstanding athletes and compelling narratives, and we don't need to draw comparisons to men's tennis. Honestly, there’s no need for competition.”
As Swiatek prepares for the Australian Open, the only Grand Slam title eluding her grasp, she contends that contemporary formats like the United Cup more accurately reflect the state of today’s game.
“I believe events like the United Cup unite the sport, allowing both WTA and ATP fans to enjoy the excitement together,” she said. “Witnessing singles players, who typically lack opportunities to participate in mixed doubles, compete in these matches enhances the appeal and quality of our sport.”
Point of View
I acknowledge Iga Swiatek's insights into the evolution of women's tennis. Swiatek’s perspective highlights the progress made in the sport and the importance of celebrating female athletes on their own terms, which is a crucial dialogue in contemporary sports.
NationPress
09/01/2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Iga Swiatek say about the 'Battle of the Sexes'?
Iga Swiatek stated that the 'Battle of the Sexes' only represents a fraction of women's tennis and does not reflect the current state of the sport.
How does Swiatek view modern events like the United Cup?
Swiatek believes that events like the United Cup better showcase women's tennis and unite fans from both WTA and ATP.
Is the context of the 1973 match still relevant today?
Swiatek argues that the context that made the 1973 match significant is no longer applicable, as women's tennis has established its own identity.
