India vs England 2nd T20I: Ishan defends team selection after 4-wicket loss

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
India vs England 2nd T20I: Ishan defends team selection after 4-wicket loss

Synopsis

India lost the 2nd T20I to England by four wickets at Old Trafford, with Ravi Bishnoi's catastrophic 17th over — 29 runs, no wickets — handing the hosts the game. Ishan Kishan defended the team selection as 'perfect' but admitted India are consistently falling 15–20 runs short and must study England's conditions-reading to stay competitive in the series.

Key Takeaways

England beat India by four wickets in the 2nd T20I at Old Trafford on 5 July , chasing 191 in 19 overs .
Jacob Bethell scored an unbeaten 76 to anchor England's recovery from 51/3 .
Ravi Bishnoi's 17th over cost 29 runs ; he finished with figures of 4-0-60-0 .
Ishan Kishan (49) , Abhishek Sharma (43) , and skipper Shreyas Iyer (37) powered India to 190/7 .
Kishan acknowledged India have been falling 15–20 runs short in both innings of the series.
15-year-old Vaibhav Sooryavanshi opened for India in the second successive match.

Ishan Kishan defended India's team selection after the side's four-wicket defeat to England in the 2nd T20I at Old Trafford, Manchester on 5 July, insisting the management had fielded the 'perfect team' and dismissing calls for an off-spinner to be included in the bowling attack.

Match Summary

India posted 190/7 in their allotted overs after electing to bat first, with Ishan Kishan top-scoring on 49, supported by skipper Shreyas Iyer (37) and Abhishek Sharma (43). England, however, chased down the target of 191 in just 19 overs, finishing at 191/6, with Jacob Bethell's unbeaten 76 anchoring a remarkable recovery from 1/2 and 51/3.

The Bishnoi Over That Turned the Match

The decisive blow came in the 17th over, bowled by leg-spinner Ravi Bishnoi, which conceded 29 runs. Bishnoi finished with figures of 4-0-60-0 — wicketless and expensive — handing England the momentum they needed. Critics and pundits quickly raised the question of whether an off-spinner could have better exploited the conditions in the middle overs, a suggestion Kishan firmly rejected.

'No, I mean, we played for a perfect team, you know. It's just that when you don't win, there are a lot of thoughts coming in, a lot of ifs and buts are coming in. But at the same time, I feel all of them were very good bowlers who have done well in the past, who have made their team win in different situations. Even bowling on very flat tracks and still getting wickets. So, I don't think we could have done anything different looking at the team side,' Kishan said at the post-match press conference.

Kishan Flags the 'Last 20 Runs' Problem

While defending the selection, Kishan acknowledged a recurring pattern in the series — India losing momentum in the backend of their innings and falling 15–20 runs short of what was achievable. The Jharkhand wicketkeeper-batter said every batter in the group needs to identify where those additional runs can come from.

'We are all looking to understand what these guys are doing against us. Like, when we play in India, we have more ideas about the wicket. So, here, obviously, every batter needs to understand, as a team, like, where we can get those extra 20 runs, whether it's by scoring boundaries or, because it's a big ground, you need to take those, whether you have to target the gaps,' he said.

Conditions and Context

India sent out 15-year-old opener Vaibhav Sooryavanshi for the second consecutive match, with Kishan slotting in at number three. The series opener had been abandoned without a ball bowled in the second innings after India set 189/7 in a rain-affected game. Kishan acknowledged that England's home advantage gives them a sharper read of pitch and bowling matchups, and said India would study what the hosts are doing better to close the gap.

With the series still alive, India will look to recalibrate their bowling strategy and finish their batting innings more decisively in the matches ahead.

Point of View

But the numbers tell a different story: a bowler conceding 29 in a single over without a wicket is a selection and tactical failure, not just bad luck. India have now twice in this series left runs on the table in the final overs, suggesting a structural problem with finishing — not just conditions. Studying England's batters is fine advice, but the more pressing question is whether India's T20 bowling attack, built for subcontinental decks, is equipped to defend totals on English surfaces where the ball skids on and spinners lose their grip on the game.
NationPress
5 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened in the 2nd T20I between India and England?
England beat India by four wickets at Old Trafford on 5 July, chasing down 191 in 19 overs. India had posted 190/7 batting first, but Jacob Bethell's unbeaten 76 guided England home from a precarious 51/3.
Why did India lose the 2nd T20I to England?
The turning point was the 17th over bowled by leg-spinner Ravi Bishnoi, which conceded 29 runs without a wicket, handing England the momentum to finish the chase. Bishnoi's final figures were 4-0-60-0.
What did Ishan Kishan say about India's team selection?
Kishan defended the selection, saying the team played a 'perfect team' and that the bowlers chosen were quality performers with strong records. He dismissed suggestions that an off-spinner was needed, calling such talk conjecture after a loss.
Who were India's top scorers in the 2nd T20I?
Ishan Kishan top-scored with 49, while Abhishek Sharma contributed 43 and skipper Shreyas Iyer added 37. Together they helped India reach 190/7 batting first at Old Trafford.
What is the current state of the India vs England T20I series?
England lead the series after winning the 2nd T20I by four wickets. The first match was abandoned without a result after rain interrupted the second innings, with India having set 189/7.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 13 hours ago
  2. 13 hours ago
  3. 13 hours ago
  4. 4 months ago
  5. 5 months ago
  6. 5 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google