Did Khawaja Evade Sanction for His Critique of the Perth Pitch?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Usman Khawaja's remarks about the Perth pitch sparked controversy.
- The ICC rated the pitch as 'very good'.
- Cricket Australia decided against sanctioning Khawaja.
- The match concluded in just two days, marking a historic low.
- Open dialogue between players and governing bodies is crucial.
New Delhi, Dec 3 (NationPress) Australian opener Usman Khawaja has seemingly dodged any repercussions for his “piece of st” comment regarding the Perth Stadium pitch, which was rated as “very good” by the ICC after the Ashes opener concluded in just two days.
Cricket Australia had requested Khawaja to explain his remarks concerning the pitch at Perth Stadium, and according to a report from the Sydney Morning Herald on Wednesday, the 38-year-old batsman will not face any disciplinary action.
“Usman’s comments do not represent how the team perceives the pitch, and the personnel at Perth Stadium are aware of this,” a spokesperson from CA was quoted as saying.
The opening Test at Perth witnessed 19 wickets tumble on Day 1 as England was bowled out for 172, with Mitchell Starc achieving his career-best figures of 7-58, while Australia found themselves at 121/9 at stumps.
On Day 2, 13 wickets fell with 380 runs scored as England was dismissed for 164. Travis Head's outstanding 123 led Australia to an eight-wicket victory, giving them a 1-0 lead in the five-match series.
This entire Test match spanned just 847 deliveries, marking it as the shortest Ashes Test by balls bowled since 1888. Despite this, match referee Ranjan Madugalle classified the Perth wicket as 'very good', the highest ranking in the ICC's four-tier rating system, denoting pitches with “good carry, limited seam movement, and consistent bounce” early in the match.
Only a day after the ICC deemed the Perth surface for the first Ashes Test as 'very good', Khawaja shared his contrasting opinion, criticizing the pitch for its variable bounce: “Day one wicket at (Perth) is a piece of st, I’m happy to say that. It has been last year; it was this year.”