Shouldn't the Team Prioritize Rishabh Pant's Health?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Prioritize player health over heroics.
- Bravery can sometimes be foolish.
- Medical team’s role is crucial in player management.
- Team dynamics should support injured players.
- Long-term recovery is essential for athlete longevity.
New Delhi, July 25 (NationPress) In light of Rishabh Pant's remarkable bravery in returning to bat after sustaining a serious injury to his right foot, former Indian cricketer Surinder Khanna expressed a different perspective. He emphasized that the team should have prioritized the wicketkeeper-batter's health following such a significant injury.
Pant had retired hurt on 37 after Chris Woakes struck his right toe during the final session of the first day. Despite reports indicating a possible fracture, he bravely returned to the crease.
When Pant stepped onto the field again at Old Trafford on Thursday, he was met with a thunderous ovation, and many former players lauded his fearless decision to put himself at risk for the team.
“In that moment, it was courageous – especially the way he executed that reverse sweep which led to the injury. What the medical reports indicate is merely speculation. The fact he chose to bat again was incredibly brave. However, given his previous car accident, he should have been closely monitored by the medical team to avoid a potentially career-ending injury. It's commendable to show bravery, but for the sake of longevity, caution is vital,” Khanna told IANS on Friday.
The seasoned cricketer noted that Rishabh Pant should have been given a break following the injury to his finger during the Lord's Test, suggesting that Dhruv Jurel, who is currently fulfilling the wicketkeeping role at Old Trafford due to Pant's foot injury, should have stepped in sooner.
“This marks the second consecutive match where Jurel has taken on wicketkeeping duties. If he is indeed capable, he should have been utilized earlier, allowing Pant the necessary rest. In the last match, after Pant hurt his finger, it was Jurel who kept wickets. This situation is becoming absurd. Either send Pant in at No. 10 or 11... he was batting alongside Washington Sundar.”
“From a cricketing perspective — if I were batting and wanted to take a quick single, Pant wouldn’t have been able to make it. Even sending him to bat at No. 11 would have been a brave decision. Bravery is commendable, but the team must prioritize his well-being. Courage is commendable, but not to the extent that it compromises his foot health. If that occurs, his mobility will be affected, and recovery could be prolonged,” Khanna explained.
The former wicketkeeper-batter further criticized the medical team's failure to properly guide Pant during this critical time, labeling it “foolhardy.”
“Playing for your country is commendable, but in this instance, your return to bat did not significantly aid the team. You were at 37-38 and managed to reach 50 - that’s a personal achievement... At times, bravery can cross the line into foolishness. It should not escalate to a point where you miss the next match or are sidelined for 2-4 months...
“You’re representing India, not playing in the IPL, where it might be perceived as a money-driven decision... The team didn’t even score 400-450 runs... Our medical team must be proficient enough to provide proper guidance to players in these situations,” Khanna stated.
Pant’s 54 helped India reach 358, adding just 17 runs after coming back to bat with his injured foot. In response, half-centuries from Ben Duckett and Zak Crawley led England to 225/2 in 46 overs at stumps, trailing India by 133 runs.