Sivaramakrishnan Clarifies Commentary Exit: BCCI & Jay Shah Uninvolved
Synopsis
Laxman Sivaramakrishnan has distanced himself from the BCCI and Jay Shah regarding his commentary exit ahead of IPL 2026. He highlights personal issues with a specific individual, addressing discrimination and professional control.
Key Takeaways
Sivaramakrishnan's resignation is a personal matter.
No involvement from BCCI or Jay Shah.
Issues of discrimination are highlighted.
Over two decades of commentary experience.
Calls for introspection within cricket regarding diversity.
New Delhi, March 21 (NationPress) Former Indian cricketer Laxman Sivaramakrishnan has made it clear that neither the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) nor current International Cricket Council (ICC) chief Jay Shah influenced his choice to resign from commentary roles ahead of the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2026. He emphasized that his concerns were directed towards a particular individual within the organization.
“Please do not involve the BCCI Administration in this matter. This is a personal issue with a BCCI employee. Jay Shah and his associates have no connection to this situation. I am taking charge of my life, and I believe I have the right to do so,” Sivaramakrishnan stated in a post on X.
The former leg-spinner had recently shared his decision to leave his long-held position as a commentator for the BCCI. In a series of posts on X, he expressed feelings of discrimination and inadequate opportunities despite being part of the commentary panel for over 20 years.
Sivaramakrishnan disclosed that he was frequently passed over for significant on-air roles like toss presentations and post-match discussions.
"I am retiring from BCCI commentary. If I haven't been utilized for TOSSES and PRESENTATIONS in 23 years, and newcomers are brought in for pitch reports and Tosses even during Shastri's coaching tenure, what do you think could be the reason?" he wrote on X.
"How does a company that owns BCCI rights decline? Any guesses? My retirement isn't anything monumental, but a narrative of TV production is unfolding. Soon, you will see the broader perspective," he added.
When a user implied that his skin color might have been a factor, Sivaramakrishnan responded, "You are correct. Color Discrimination is real."
After his initial comments, numerous fans criticized the BCCI and its management. However, Sivaramakrishnan sought to clarify the speculation, reiterating that his decision was personal and aimed at reclaiming control over his professional journey.
Sivaramakrishnan represented India in nine tests and 16 ODIs between 1985 and 1987, notably taking 12 wickets against England in 1984 and being a key player in the 1985 World Championship victory.
Point of View
It's crucial to understand that Laxman Sivaramakrishnan's departure from commentary is primarily a personal decision. His concerns are directed at systemic issues rather than any specific organization or individual. This narrative highlights the need for introspection within the cricket fraternity regarding diversity and opportunity.
NationPress
8 May 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did Laxman Sivaramakrishnan resign from commentary?
He cited personal issues with a specific individual and expressed concerns about discrimination and lack of opportunities despite his long tenure in commentary.
Did the BCCI or Jay Shah influence his decision?
No, Sivaramakrishnan clarified that his decision was solely his own and not influenced by the BCCI or Jay Shah.
What did Sivaramakrishnan say about discrimination?
He mentioned feeling overlooked for key assignments and highlighted issues of color discrimination in his posts.
How long was Sivaramakrishnan involved in commentary?
He was associated with the commentary panel for over 20 years.
What were his notable achievements as a cricketer?
Sivaramakrishnan took 12 wickets against England in 1984 and played a significant role in India's 1985 World Championship victory.
