Is it Ethical for Stokes to Bowl So Many Yorkers at Pant with an Injured Foot?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Monty Panesar questions the ethics behind Ben Stokes' decision to bowl yorkers at Rishabh Pant, who returned to the crease with a potential foot fracture. Explore the implications of this move, Pant's courageous performance, and the ongoing Test match dynamics.
Key Takeaways
- Monty Panesar questions the ethics of bowling at an injured player.
- Rishabh Pant shows remarkable bravery by returning to bat with an injury.
- England trails India by 133 runs after day two.
- Pant adds crucial runs to India's total.
- Sportsmanship in cricket is under scrutiny.
New Delhi, July 25 (NationPress) Former England spinner Monty Panesar has raised concerns regarding the decision made by host captain Ben Stokes to bowl yorkers aimed at injured Rishabh Pant when he returned to bat on the second day of the fourth Test at Old Trafford.
Pant, who had retired hurt on 37 after sustaining an injury to his right toe from a delivery by Chris Woakes during the final session of the opening day, bravely returned to the crease despite speculation regarding a possible fracture to his foot. He visibly struggled as he limped while attempting to complete his singles.
The vice-captain of India received an enthusiastic welcome from the audience and garnered admiration from former players, including Panesar. However, the seasoned spinner criticized Stokes for targeting Pant's already compromised foot with yorkers, given his evident discomfort.
"I think what he did was incredibly courageous, but it’s a significant risk. You wouldn’t want him to exacerbate his injury, especially with a fractured toe. His performance is commendable, demonstrating remarkable bravery and strength of character. It echoes the spirit shown by Anil Kumble when he played with a fractured jaw," Panesar remarked to IANS.
Pant managed to add 17 runs to his previous score, ending up with a determined total of 54, helping elevate India's first innings total to 358.
In response, England's innings saw impressive contributions from Ben Duckett and Zak Crawley, who led the team to 225/2 in 46 overs at stumps, leaving them trailing India by 133 runs.
Point of View
It is our responsibility to present an unbiased perspective on this cricketing controversy. While Pant's determination is commendable, the ethics of targeting an injured player warrant scrutiny. This incident highlights the fine line between competitive spirit and sportsmanship.
NationPress
26/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did Pant return to bat despite his injury?
Rishabh Pant returned to bat due to his resilience and determination to contribute to India's innings, despite reports suggesting a possible fracture.
What did Monty Panesar say about Stokes' bowling strategy?
Monty Panesar questioned the ethics of Ben Stokes targeting Pant's injured foot with yorkers, suggesting it was risky given Pant's condition.
How did the crowd react to Pant's return?
Rishabh Pant received a warm welcome from the crowd, showcasing the fans' admiration for his courage and fighting spirit.
What was Pant's contribution to India's total?
Rishabh Pant scored a gritty 54 runs, helping India reach a first innings total of 358.
What was the state of the match after the second day?
At the end of the second day, England was at 225/2, trailing India by 133 runs in their first innings.
