Is the BC quota ordinance a victory for Telangana Jagruthi, as claimed by Kavitha?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- 42% reservation for backward classes in local bodies is now a reality.
- K. Kavitha emphasizes the need for immediate government action.
- The victory rally signifies public support for BC rights.
- Concerns over political motivations behind the ordinance remain.
- A call for constitutional amendments to strengthen BC representation.
Hyderabad, July 11 (NationPress) K. Kavitha, president of Telangana Jagruthi and member of the Legislative Council from BRS, asserted on Friday that the Congress government's move to introduce an ordinance for 42 percent reservation for backward classes in local bodies marks a significant triumph for both the backward classes and Telangana Jagruthi.
She expressed her approval of the state Cabinet's decision to amend the existing Act to secure 42 percent reservation for Backward Classes (BCs).
Kavitha, the daughter of K. Chandrasekhar Rao, the BRS president and former Chief Minister, led a jubilant 'victory rally' from her Banjara Hills residence to Tank Bund, where she paid homage by garlanding the statue of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar.
During a press conference, Kavitha declared that in light of the state government's decision, Telangana Jagruthi would postpone the planned 'Rail Roko' event set for July 17.
Telangana Jagruthi, the cultural wing of BRS, had previously announced 'Rail Roko' to urge the Centre to endorse two Bills passed by the Telangana Legislature aimed at increasing BC reservation to 42 percent in education, jobs, and local governance.
On Thursday, the State Cabinet decided to implement an ordinance to boost the BC quota in local bodies.
Kavitha mentioned they will wait a week for the government to take action, stating that if no steps are initiated, they will proceed with the 'Rail Roko'.
She claimed that the government’s decision was a result of pressure from public demonstrations organized by Telangana Jagruthi.
She supported the Cabinet's initiative to introduce the ordinance ahead of local body elections, demanding immediate action from the government.
Kavitha, a Legislative Council member, expressed some reservations, questioning, 'If the reservation can be implemented right after issuing an ordinance, why did the Congress government delay for 18 months?'
She suggested that the Congress government might have postponed the decision for political advantage, accusing it of using reservation issues to distract the public from its electoral promises.
The MLC warned that failure to implement election promises would pose challenges for BCs, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and minorities.
She also called on the state government to address BC reservation in education and employment, noting that a Constitutional amendment could secure political rights for BCs.
'If the BJP, which holds power at the Centre, desires, it can amend the Constitution swiftly, yet it refrains from doing so,' she remarked, hinting that they might be seeking to deflect blame onto the Congress party.
Kavitha urged Union Minister of State for Home Bandi Sanjay to take the lead in ensuring that BC bills are incorporated into Schedule 9 of the Constitution.