BJD questions anti-cheating law amendments, cites 23 Odisha leaks under BJP
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Opposition Biju Janata Dal (BJD) on Friday, 24 July questioned the effectiveness of the Union government's proposed amendments to the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, arguing that tougher legal provisions alone will not stop recurring question paper leaks unless backed by rigorous enforcement. The party made its position clear at a press conference held at Sankha Bhawan in Bhubaneswar.
BJD's Core Argument
BJD Spokesperson and Media Coordinator Lenin Mohanty said the Union Cabinet's approval of the amendments comes against the backdrop of nationwide student protests triggered by a string of examination paper leak incidents. He pointed out that more than 150 question paper leak incidents have been reported across the country over the past 12 years, causing widespread anxiety among students and their families.
Mohanty also noted that the movement sparked by the NEET question paper leak controversy had rattled the entire country, adding political urgency to the legislative push. While acknowledging that the proposed amendments prescribe stricter punishment, he maintained that the legislation would remain hollow without sincere enforcement.
'To prevent question paper leaks and ensure accountability, the law must be implemented in a strict, impartial and effective manner. Unless there is sincere enforcement and timely punishment of those responsible, such incidents will continue,' Mohanty said.
Odisha Under the Spotlight
The BJD leader trained his sights specifically on the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government in Odisha, alleging that question paper leak incidents have persisted in the state even after the Odisha Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 was passed by the Odisha Assembly on 6 December 2024.
According to Mohanty, 23 question paper leak incidents have surfaced in Odisha during the past two years under the BJP's 'double-engine government'. He alleged that not a single accused in those cases has been punished so far — a gap he said exposes the chasm between legislation and its enforcement.
The National Context
The Union Cabinet's move to amend the 2024 Act was aimed at strengthening legal provisions against examination-related malpractices, including paper leaks. The amendments follow sustained pressure from student groups and civil society organisations that have demanded systemic reform of India's public examination infrastructure. This is not the first time that a legislative response to the leak crisis has drawn scepticism — critics have long argued that India's examination system suffers from structural weaknesses that laws alone cannot fix.
What the BJD Demands
The BJD called for a permanent solution that goes beyond tougher legal provisions, emphasising swift and exemplary punishment for those found guilty. The party's stance reflects a broader national debate: whether India's answer to the examination integrity crisis lies in stricter statutes, institutional overhaul, or both. With student protests continuing in several states, the pressure on both the Centre and state governments to demonstrate tangible action is unlikely to ease soon.