BJP's Vijay Sampla accuses Punjab AAP govt of exploiting sacrilege cases

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
BJP's Vijay Sampla accuses Punjab AAP govt of exploiting sacrilege cases

Synopsis

Former Punjab BJP chief Vijay Sampla walked out of his fourth SIT appearance in the Behbal Kalan firing case and turned the spotlight back on the AAP government — accusing it of weaponising sacrilege grief ahead of elections while failing to deliver justice in over four-and-a-half years in power. The SIT's refusal to provide certified copies of documents shown to him adds a procedural flashpoint to an already politically charged case.

Key Takeaways

Vijay Sampla , former Punjab BJP president, appeared before the SIT in Chandigarh on 7 July — his fourth summons in the 2015 Behbal Kalan firing case .
Sampla accused the AAP government of politically exploiting sacrilege sentiments to distract from governance failures after four-and-a-half years in power.
The SIT questioned him for nearly three hours over a memorandum submitted to the Governor on 12 January 2018 .
Sampla and his legal team repeatedly requested certified copies of the documents shown; the SIT declined each time.
The BJP maintains it has consistently demanded a fair, impartial, and transparent probe into Behbal Kalan and that its position remains unchanged.

Former Union Minister and former Punjab Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) President Vijay Sampla on Tuesday, 7 July accused the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) state government of politically exploiting the sensitive sacrilege issue to deflect public attention from its governance failures. Sampla made the remarks after appearing before a Special Investigation Team (SIT) in Chandigarh in connection with the 2015 Behbal Kalan firing case, which is linked to multiple sacrilege incidents.

Sampla's Core Charge Against the AAP Government

Speaking to reporters after the SIT appearance, Sampla said the AAP government had made justice in the sacrilege cases a central poll promise before coming to power, yet had failed to deliver any tangible outcome in over four-and-a-half years. He argued that with elections approaching, the ruling party was once again attempting to revive the issue — this time, he alleged, to exploit the emotions of the Sikh community for political gain rather than to secure genuine accountability.

Sampla maintained that the BJP's position on the Behbal Kalan incident has been consistent: every person responsible must be identified through a fair, impartial, and transparent investigation and awarded the strictest punishment permissible under law. He stressed this stance remains unchanged.

The SIT Summons and the Document Dispute

This was the fourth summons issued to Sampla by the SIT. He noted he had previously appeared before the SIT in Jalandhar as well, and on each occasion had requested certified copies of the documents on which his responses were being sought. According to Sampla, those requests were not fulfilled.

During the latest round of questioning, which lasted nearly three hours, the SIT showed him a memorandum submitted to the Governor on 12 January 2018. Sampla questioned why an SIT inquiry was being initiated over a document that was neither confidential nor secret and had already been shared publicly with the media at the time of its submission.

He and his legal team again requested a certified copy of the document, arguing that in the digital age, documents can be manipulated and only a certified copy can be treated as reliable. The SIT, he said, declined to provide one despite the repeated request — a refusal he called unreasonable.

BJP's Stand on Sacrilege Justice

Sampla reiterated that the BJP has never shielded anyone responsible for the sacrilege incidents or the Behbal Kalan police firing. He said the party's demand for a fair probe is not new and should not be conflated with opposition to accountability. Critics, however, may note that the BJP itself was in power in Punjab during the period when the original incidents occurred and the early investigations were conducted.

What Comes Next

The SIT proceedings in the Behbal Kalan case are ongoing, and Sampla has indicated he will continue to cooperate while insisting on procedural fairness, including access to certified documents. The political temperature around sacrilege-related cases in Punjab is expected to remain elevated as the state moves closer to the next electoral cycle.

Point of View

And the cases remain unresolved. Yet the BJP's credibility on this issue is complicated by the fact that the original incidents and the early investigative failures occurred on its watch in Punjab. The SIT's refusal to provide certified copies of documents to a summoned witness is a procedural question that deserves independent scrutiny, separate from the political theatre around it. The real accountability deficit here belongs to the system, not just one party.
NationPress
7 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Vijay Sampla appear before the SIT in Chandigarh?
Vijay Sampla appeared before the Special Investigation Team in Chandigarh on 7 July in connection with the 2015 Behbal Kalan firing case, which is linked to multiple sacrilege incidents in Punjab. This was his fourth summons from the SIT.
What is the Behbal Kalan firing case?
The Behbal Kalan firing case refers to a 2015 incident in Punjab in which police opened fire during protests over sacrilege of the Guru Granth Sahib, resulting in deaths. The case has remained politically sensitive and legally unresolved, with an SIT conducting an ongoing inquiry.
What did Vijay Sampla allege against the AAP government?
Sampla alleged that the AAP government, despite promising justice in sacrilege cases before coming to power, had failed to deliver in over four-and-a-half years. He accused the ruling party of reviving the issue ahead of elections to exploit Sikh community sentiment for political gain.
What is the dispute over documents in the SIT proceedings?
During the latest questioning, the SIT showed Sampla a memorandum submitted to the Governor on 12 January 2018. He and his legal team repeatedly requested a certified copy of the document, arguing that digital documents can be manipulated. The SIT declined to provide a certified copy despite the requests.
What is the BJP's stated position on the sacrilege cases?
The BJP has maintained that every person responsible for the Behbal Kalan incident must be identified through a fair, impartial, and transparent investigation and awarded the strictest punishment under law. Sampla said this position has been consistent and remains unchanged.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 days ago
  2. 4 weeks ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 6 months ago
  6. 8 months ago
  7. 12 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google