Is China Exploiting Fragile Environments and Ignoring Local Voices?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
A recent report exposes the contradictions in China’s environmental policies, revealing the exploitation of Tibet’s fragile ecosystems. As President Xi Jinping pledges emission cuts, the reality on the ground tells a different story, highlighting the neglect of local communities and the environmental hazards of state-sponsored celebrations in occupied regions.
Key Takeaways
- China's hypocrisy in environmental leadership is evident through its actions in Tibet.
- The Shigatse plateau fireworks event raised serious environmental concerns.
- Tibet's glaciers are vital to the water supply of nearly two billion people.
- Local communities continue to face neglect and exploitation.
- China's hydropower projects pose risks in a seismically active region.
Beijing, Oct 10 (NationPress) China, which positions itself as a responsible global stakeholder, is accused of exploiting fragile environments and disregarding the voices of local communities, particularly in occupied regions like Tibet, as highlighted in a recent report.
A report from the UK-based publication for British Asians, Asian Lite, noted that during his latest address at the United Nations General Assembly, Chinese President Xi Jinping committed to reducing emissions by 7-10 percent by 2035, despite China being accountable for 30 percent of global emissions.
Recently, the skies above the Shigatse plateau in Tibet were illuminated by a colorful fireworks display organized by a Chinese-owned outdoor brand and pyrotechnics artist. The event, titled “Rising Dragon,” aimed to honor mountain culture but faced significant backlash, as reported by Sakariya Kareem in Asian Lite.
The environmental hazards of hosting a high-altitude fireworks display in one of the world’s most fragile ecosystems were notably emphasized. Tibet, often referred to as the 'Third Pole,' is home to glaciers that feed Asia’s major rivers, supporting nearly two billion people downstream. However, Cai’s dragon display, held at an elevation of 5,500 metres, released noise, smoke, and chemical residues into the atmosphere. A local environmental official claimed that the event didn’t require a review as it employed 'eco-friendly' materials and was outside protected zones. Nevertheless, the publicity campaign quickly faced harsh criticism on Chinese social media, prompting officials in Shigatse to launch an investigation. Environmental experts disputed these assurances, indicating that decomposition at high altitudes is exceedingly slow, which means that toxic debris could persist for many years.
“While the event aimed to raise awareness of Tibetan culture, it highlighted the ongoing neglect and disregard as the Chinese Communist Party (CPC) continues to exploit Tibet’s strategic location for military advantages and its unique landscape for tourism expansion. Meanwhile, the Tibetan people endure a scarcity of fundamental rights and opportunities. The Chinese government’s failure to recognize that the Tibetan Plateau is not merely an aesthetic backdrop to be reshaped at will is evident,” the report further stated.
China has aggressively pursued hydropower and infrastructure projects across the plateau. An analysis revealed the region's seismic susceptibility following a devastating earthquake in Tibet that affected reservoirs, despite numerous dams already in place and more in planning stages, raising alarms about the risks of earthquakes, landslides, and instability linked to these reservoirs. Building large hydro projects in tectonically active, glacier-fed landscapes is not just imprudent but poses a serious threat of transboundary environmental damage. Independent reports and advocacy organizations have emphasized the catastrophic effects of China’s hydropower expansion in Tibet. This event underscores China’s hypocrisy regarding its claims of global climate leadership while exploiting Tibet for financial gain, propaganda, and power.
“This is the same China that remains the world’s leading polluter, responsible for 30 percent of global emissions, while hastily constructing coal plants domestically even as it champions renewable investments abroad. It is the same China that disguises destructive fireworks displays and massive hydropower initiatives as 'paying tribute to nature' and 'celebrating culture.' The irony is staggering. Internationally, Beijing presents itself as a responsible stakeholder, advocating for sustainability. Domestically, it plunders fragile environments and silences local communities, especially in occupied regions like Tibet,” concluded the Asian Lite report.
Point of View
I remain committed to presenting the truth. This report sheds light on the ongoing environmental and social injustices faced by local communities in Tibet. It is imperative for the global community to hold China accountable for its actions, ensuring that the plight of the Tibetan people is not overshadowed by political narratives. We must advocate for a balanced approach that prioritizes both ecological preservation and the rights of indigenous populations.
NationPress
14/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the environmental impacts of China's activities in Tibet?
China's activities in Tibet, particularly hydropower projects and large-scale events like fireworks displays, pose significant environmental risks, including pollution, habitat destruction, and long-term ecological damage in one of the world's most fragile ecosystems.
How does the Chinese government justify its actions in Tibet?
The Chinese government often claims that its initiatives in Tibet are aimed at promoting economic development and cultural appreciation, despite the evident environmental and social consequences faced by local communities.
What is the significance of the Tibetan Plateau?
The Tibetan Plateau, known as the 'Third Pole,' is crucial as it houses glaciers that feed major rivers in Asia, supporting nearly two billion people downstream, making its ecological integrity vital for regional water security.
What has been the response from local communities regarding these events?
Local communities have expressed significant concern and criticism regarding events like the fireworks display, highlighting the lack of consultation and the potential environmental harms these activities bring to their indigenous lands.
Is China making progress in reducing its emissions?
While China has pledged to reduce emissions by 7-10% by 2035, critics argue that its ongoing reliance on coal and large-scale industrial projects undermines these commitments, particularly in regions like Tibet.
