Is Former PPP Lawmaker Choo Indicted Over Alleged Role in Martial Law?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant political development, former PPP floor leader Choo Kyung-ho has been indicted for allegedly obstructing a parliamentary vote aimed at lifting a controversial martial law decree initiated by ousted President Yoon Suk Yeol. This indictment raises questions about political motivations and the implications for South Korea's governance.
Key Takeaways
- Choo Kyung-ho indicted on charges related to Yoon Suk Yeol's martial law.
- Indictment follows claims of obstructing a parliamentary vote.
- Choo denies the charges, calling them politically motivated.
- A court denied an arrest warrant due to lack of evidence.
- Former Prime Minister Hwang Kyo-ahn also indicted on related charges.
Seoul, Dec 7 (NationPress) A special counsel team has indicted Representative Choo Kyung-ho, the former floor leader of the People Power Party (PPP), on charges linked to the martial law attempt by ousted President Yoon Suk Yeol last December.
The investigation led by special counsel Cho Eun-suk revealed that Choo was indicted without being taken into custody, facing allegations of obstructing fellow lawmakers from voting on lifting the martial law decree that was issued on December 3 of the previous year.
The counsel had requested an arrest warrant for Choo; however, a Seoul court rejected this request last week, citing disputes regarding the case's facts and insufficient justification for his arrest, as reported by Yonhap News Agency.
Choo, who was once a close ally of Yoon, is accused of intentionally altering the location of an emergency party meeting on the night of December 3 at Yoon's behest. The PPP was the ruling party during Yoon's presidency.
These venue changes resulted in only 18 of the PPP's 108 lawmakers participating in the parliamentary vote to revoke Yoon's decree, which subsequently passed unanimously among the 190 lawmakers present the next morning.
In response, Choo criticized the indictment as “unwarranted”, asserting that the allegations were fabricated and that he had not received any martial law-related requests from Yoon.
He stated, “The special counsel moved forward with its politically motivated indictment without additional evidence, even after its request for an arrest warrant was denied due to lack of substantiation.”
In late November, the National Assembly approved a motion for Choo's arrest. Under current law, sitting lawmakers enjoy immunity from arrest while the Parliament is in session and can only be arrested with Assembly consent.
Simultaneously, the special counsel team also indicted former Prime Minister Hwang Kyo-ahn without physical detention on charges of inciting an insurrection in connection with Yoon's martial law decree. He faces additional charges of special obstruction of public duty.
Hwang, who served under former President Park Geun-hye, posted messages on Facebook following Yoon's brief martial law declaration, calling for the removal of pro-North Korea elements and those allegedly involved in electoral fraud.
He also demanded the arrest of National Assembly Speaker Woo Won-shik and then-PPP leader Han Dong-hoon.
A court similarly dismissed an arrest warrant for Hwang last month, citing inadequate rationale for the necessity of his arrest.
Point of View
Where the actions of influential figures like Choo Kyung-ho and Yoon Suk Yeol are under intense scrutiny. As national editor-in-chief, we remain committed to providing an objective analysis of these developments, ensuring that the public receives fair and accurate reporting.
NationPress
07/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the charges against Choo Kyung-ho?
Choo Kyung-ho has been indicted for allegedly obstructing party lawmakers from participating in a vote to lift the martial law decree issued by President Yoon Suk Yeol.
Why was Choo's arrest warrant denied?
A Seoul court denied the arrest warrant due to disputes over the case's facts and insufficient justification for his arrest.
What was Choo's defense against the indictment?
Choo denounced the indictment as unwarranted and based on fabricated charges, claiming he had not received any request from Yoon regarding martial law.
What does the law say about the arrest of sitting lawmakers?
Sitting lawmakers in South Korea are immune from arrest while Parliament is in session unless they receive consent from the Assembly.
What are the implications of this indictment for South Korea's political future?
This indictment raises significant questions about political motivations in South Korea and could influence future governance and party dynamics.
