Is ECI's SIR in Tamil Nadu a Tool to Oppress the Vulnerable?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a scathing critique, Congress MP Manickam Tagore accuses the Election Commission of India of using the Special Intensive Review (SIR) as a manipulative tool against the poor and elderly voters in Tamil Nadu, raising serious concerns over the integrity of the electoral process and the influence of the BJP.
Key Takeaways
- Congress MP Manickam Tagore criticizes the ECI's SIR.
- Allegations of manipulating voter lists under BJP's influence.
- Concerns about the impact on vulnerable communities.
- Political tensions rise ahead of Tamil Nadu elections.
- Chirag Paswan's comments add to the controversy.
New Delhi, Oct 25 (NationPress) Congress MP Manickam Tagore vehemently criticized the Election Commission of India (ECI) on Saturday, claiming that the Special Intensive Review (SIR) initiative is being utilized as a “tool to oppress the vulnerable” and to manipulate voter lists under the influence of the BJP.
On October 23, the ECI revealed that it had conducted individual meetings with the Chief Electoral Officers (CEOs) of various states and Union Territories heading into elections — including Assam, Tamil Nadu, Puducherry, Kerala, and West Bengal — during a two-day conference at the India International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Management (IIIDEM) in New Delhi.
In a strong response to this, Tagore stated, “SIR serves as a mechanism to intimidate the impoverished and disenfranchise the elderly. This operation is orchestrated under the directives of the BJP and Amit Shah. Their next target is Tamil Nadu. This initiative is not aimed at rectifying the voter list but rather at eliminating innocent voters and harassing the populace. The ECI is not committed to operating with integrity.”
Tagore also addressed remarks made by Union Minister for Food Processing Industries and LJP(RV) chief Chirag Paswan regarding the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD).
Paswan accused the RJD of exploiting the Muslim community for votes while failing to provide them with adequate political representation, urging the community to “liberate themselves from the shackles of a vote bank mentality.”
Questioning Paswan’s stance, Tagore remarked, “I am baffled as to why Chirag Paswan would voice such opinions while being allied with Amit Shah, who is known for his anti-Muslim sentiments. Being associated with such individuals while discussing Muslim voters is something he should reconsider. Now that he is a Union Minister, it’s evident how he has compromised his principles for that position.”
Tagore asserted confidence that the Mahagathbandhan will secure victory in the upcoming elections, stating, “Once the Mahagathbandhan prevails, we will unify all communities. There will be a Deputy Chief Minister from the Congress, and decisions will be made accordingly post-elections. Chirag Paswan should refrain from making such statements, and the minority community must recognize that he is making these comments while allied with anti-Muslim figures.”
Point of View
NationPress
26/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Special Intensive Review (SIR)?
The Special Intensive Review (SIR) is an initiative by the Election Commission of India aimed at assessing and improving the electoral process, particularly voter registration and list accuracy.
Why is the Congress Party opposing SIR?
The Congress Party, particularly MP Manickam Tagore, opposes the SIR, claiming it is used to harass the poor and manipulate voter lists under the influence of the BJP.
What are the implications of these allegations?
If true, the allegations could undermine public trust in the electoral process and raise concerns about the fairness of upcoming elections.
How does this issue affect Tamil Nadu?
The issue is particularly relevant in Tamil Nadu as the state prepares for elections, with concerns about voter disenfranchisement among vulnerable communities.
Who is Chirag Paswan, and why is he mentioned?
Chirag Paswan is the Union Minister for Food Processing Industries and LJP(RV) chief. He was mentioned due to his comments regarding the RJD and the Muslim community, which sparked further political debate.
