Why Did ED Attach Rs 1.75 Crore Property in Illegal Corbett Constructions Case?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant crackdown on corruption, the ED has provisionally attached assets worth Rs 1.75 crore linked to illegal constructions in Corbett National Park. This article explores the implications of this case on forest officials and the environment.
Key Takeaways
- ED's action: Provisional attachment of Rs 1.75 crore in assets.
- Corruption case: Linked to illegal constructions in Corbett National Park.
- Legal framework: Involves multiple laws including PMLA and IPC.
- Nexus uncovered: Involvement of forest officials and contractors.
- Ongoing investigation: Aims to track the money trail and related properties.
New Delhi, July 10 (NationPress) The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) has provisionally attached immovable assets valued at approximately Rs 1.75 crore in a case of corruption and money laundering related to unlawful constructions within Corbett National Park.
This action was executed under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, following an FIR lodged by the Vigilance Establishment, Dehradun.
The FIR invoked various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
The ED's investigation has disclosed a significant nexus involving Kishanchand, the former Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) of Kalagarh Tiger Reserve, as well as Brij Bihari Sharma, the former Forest Ranger of Pakhro Range, among other forest officials and contractors.
The accused individuals are alleged to have authorized and facilitated the construction of numerous unlawful structures within Corbett National Park without obtaining the necessary approvals, leading to substantial environmental degradation and financial losses to the state.
According to the ED, the proceeds from these illicit activities were utilized to acquire immovable properties in the names of close family members, including properties registered under Rajlaxmi Sharma, the wife of Brij Bihari Sharma, and Abhishek Kumar Singh and Yugendra Kumar Singh, the sons of Kishanchand.
The seized assets comprise land parcels located in the Haridwar district of Uttarakhand and the Bijnor district of Uttar Pradesh.
A Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) has been issued for these properties, representing a pivotal advancement in the financial investigation.
This case raises critical concerns regarding corruption and environmental infringements by forest officials tasked with safeguarding India's vital wildlife reserves.
Additionally, it highlights the improper use of authority for personal gain, resulting in substantial losses to the state.
Further inquiries are currently in progress to uncover the full extent of the financial trail and identify more assets linked to the alleged abuse of power.
Point of View
This case underscores the critical need for accountability among officials responsible for environmental conservation. The allegations not only highlight corruption but also emphasize the dire consequences of such misconduct on India's rich biodiversity. It is imperative that we uphold transparency and integrity in protecting our natural heritage.
NationPress
16/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the value of the assets attached by the ED?
The Directorate of Enforcement has provisionally attached assets worth approximately Rs 1.75 crore.
What laws are involved in the case?
The case involves the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Who are the main accused in this case?
The main accused include Kishanchand, the former Divisional Forest Officer, and Brij Bihari Sharma, the former Forest Ranger, along with other forest officials and contractors.
What environmental impact has the illegal construction caused?
The illegal constructions have led to significant environmental damage and financial losses to the state exchequer.
What are the next steps in the investigation?
Further investigations are underway to trace the full extent of the money trail and identify additional assets linked to the misuse of authority.
