Did the ED Attach Assets Worth Rs 5 Crore from Ex-IAS Arvind Joshi?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Bhopal, Jan 30 (NationPress) In a recent turn of events relating to the money laundering investigation of former IAS officer from Madhya Pradesh, Arvind Joshi, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has seized assets, which encompass both residential and agricultural properties alongside a resort, collectively valued at Rs 5 crore.
The central investigative body announced on Friday that a provisional order was enacted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) to seize residential plots, agricultural lands, and a functioning resort situated in the Bhopal district.
“The Bhopal Zonal Office has provisionally taken action against immovable assets totaling approximately Rs 5 crore, which include residential properties, agricultural land, and an operational resort in Bhopal district, following the PMLA, 2002, concerning the case of the late Arvind Joshi, IAS (MP), who previously served as Principal Secretary to the Madhya Pradesh Government, along with his family and associate S P Kohli,” the ED stated.
It’s worth noting that both Joshi and his former IAS spouse, Tinoo Joshi, have been under the scrutiny of the ED in relation to an alleged Rs 41.87 crore disproportionate assets (DA) money laundering case for over eight years.
Arvind Joshi, a 1979-batch IAS officer who retired as principal secretary, passed away during treatment at a private hospital in Delhi in 2022 at the age of 68.
Previously, the ED had issued a similar asset attachment order against the couple and had filed a chargesheet involving them.
The basis for the money laundering case originates from a Madhya Pradesh Lokayukta Police FIR against Joshi for holding DA from July 1979 to December 10, 2010, leading to the dismissal of both officers from service in 2014.
In 2015, Arvind Joshi surrendered to a district court after the Supreme Court denied his bail request, citing his history of evading investigative authorities.
Joshi had sought anticipatory bail from the Supreme Court in relation to a Rs 42 crore disproportionate assets case after his plea was rejected by the Madhya Pradesh High Court.